Re: On prioritising hilarity value over EV.....
 

fantastic hand.

Re: On prioritising hilarity value over EV.....
 

[ QUOTE ]
i mean, to be fair, that "donk" was ahead on two of the three streets [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
ok lets count from 1 to 4

preeee flooooppp
floooooppppp
tuuuurn
riiiivvvverrrRRRR

i see both players ahead on two of the 4!!! streets

Re: On prioritising hilarity value over EV.....
 

ill be the donk here is what im thinking:

flop: he doesnt have an ace since he wouldve raised preflop and he probably just wants a free card on the turn and with jq or jk and a bdfd.

turn: im not gonna give him that free card the [censored] does he think he is, oh hes raising again maybe he does have an ace, but then again maybe that club gave him a flush draw with his straight draw and hes semibluffing

river: lol he checked he missed, maybe he will call with king high im gonna take him to valuetow...he raised wtf oh well its only one more be9Jo HAYACHCAHYCAHCAY

Re: On prioritising hilarity value over EV.....
 

Guy is soooo awful.

Re: On prioritising hilarity value over EV.....
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i mean, to be fair, that "donk" was ahead on two of the three streets [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
ok lets count from 1 to 4

preeee flooooppp
floooooppppp
tuuuurn
riiiivvvverrrRRRR

i see both players ahead on two of the 4!!! streets

[/ QUOTE ]

nit alert

Re: On prioritising hilarity value over EV.....
 

Negative EV: -$55
Hilarity EV: $50

Add in the opponent tilt factor and I think we have a winner.