Re: 5/10 Top Set AA,, Deadly River Shove
 

ur [censored] casino casino u call everything obv call

Re: 5/10 Top Set AA,, Deadly River Shove
 

I would have bet the river myself, but I think I would fold to that 2x jam. If he was calling flop and turn in an effort to not scare you off with 44/55, I don't expect him to push 2x now. If he had 67, he has second pair, and I really don't expect someone like this to pull something like this with second pair. It really looks like he improved on the river and excitedly sticks all the money in (33, A3s, 34/35/maybe 36s or K3s?). 222 makes sense as well (3 makes more sense as more probable ways he can have it and a 2x pot jam like this is generally a lock hand, but 222 is lookin pretty lock to him if he has gotten this far with it and you check river to him ).

Also, Parlay Slow said he is more likely to fold than call, and would also bet river himself, in case anyone cares what that drooler thinks.

Re: 5/10 Top Set AA,, Deadly River Shove
 

EASIEST CALL EVER.

You fold this, you lose a ton of money in the long run.

Re: 5/10 Top Set AA,, Deadly River Shove
 

[ QUOTE ]
EASIEST CALL EVER.


[/ QUOTE ]

What does he have? Or is that not part of your thought process here?

Re: 5/10 Top Set AA,, Deadly River Shove
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
EASIEST CALL EVER.


[/ QUOTE ]

What does he have? Or is that not part of your thought process here?

[/ QUOTE ]

dude you know retardo mcretard is never coming back to this thread. he said his piece and he's out. you got a problem, stop over at his crib and talk to him.

Re: 5/10 Top Set AA,, Deadly River Shove
 

[ QUOTE ]
I would have bet the river myself, but I think I would fold to that 2x jam. If he was calling flop and turn in an effort to not scare you off with 44/55, I don't expect him to push 2x now. If he had 67, he has second pair, and I really don't expect someone like this to pull something like this with second pair. It really looks like he improved on the river and excitedly sticks all the money in (33, A3s, 34/35/maybe 36s or K3s?). 222 makes sense as well (3 makes more sense as more probable ways he can have it and a 2x pot jam like this is generally a lock hand, but 222 is lookin pretty lock to him if he has gotten this far with it and you check river to him ).

Also, Parlay Slow said he is more likely to fold than call, and would also bet river himself, in case anyone cares what that drooler thinks.

[/ QUOTE ]


yeah i agree with all of this

Re: 5/10 Top Set AA,, Deadly River Shove
 

Doesn't OP's hand look a lot like AQ/AK? Villain can be shoving a lot of two pair hands and all sets. Seems like you have to call here.

Re: 5/10 Top Set AA,, Deadly River Shove
 

i dunno, depends how sophisticated villain is and how tricky he thinks you are. against a standard opponent i'll value shove smaller sets and some 2prs here all day

of course i'd probably expect him to play it faster but people change up their play sometimes believe it or not

Re: 5/10 Top Set AA,, Deadly River Shove
 

[ QUOTE ]
Doesn't OP's hand look a lot like AQ/AK? Villain can be shoving a lot of two pair hands and all sets. Seems like you have to call here.

[/ QUOTE ]

why would villain shove two pair and set hands on this river if he thinks he is up against AQ/AK [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

Re: 5/10 Top Set AA,, Deadly River Shove
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Doesn't OP's hand look a lot like AQ/AK? Villain can be shoving a lot of two pair hands and all sets. Seems like you have to call here.

[/ QUOTE ]

why would villain shove two pair and set hands on this river if he thinks he is up against AQ/AK [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

To get paid!

Anyway, I call; reading it over I think he'd have to have A3s or 36s for this to make any sense, and if you think a bluff is likely enough, weigh that and call. (And a bluff seems much more likely than either of those.)