Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=56)
-   -   $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers (worst ever?) (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=156863)

bdams19 07-08-2006 02:19 PM

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers (worst ever?)
 
he knew the 4 was coming, you need to stop thinking about what he had preflop and work on your flop, turn, and rivers

Oxy 07-08-2006 02:44 PM

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers (worst ever?)
 
... lol everyone that's saying this is such a bad hand is extremely wrong. standard push.

adanthar 07-08-2006 03:06 PM

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers (worst ever?)
 
[ QUOTE ]
... lol everyone that's saying this is such a bad hand is extremely wrong. standard push.

[/ QUOTE ]

if he got called by 54s, no it isn't

pismeyer 07-08-2006 03:41 PM

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers
 
[ QUOTE ]
I was the villain in this hand and I knew the OP had trash, so it was a fairly easy call, and it turned out to be the right one

[/ QUOTE ]

...Good call...wrong forum [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

Gary Stevenson 07-08-2006 03:45 PM

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers
 
lol, DONK n GOs

EscapePlan9 07-08-2006 05:55 PM

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers
 
I knew the villain was very loose, like 50/13 or whatever, but he's folded to my raises before, so I really didn't expect him to call here.

[ QUOTE ]

What forum do you think you are in?

[/ QUOTE ]

I wasn't sure whether this would be better in STT or here. Variance in the sense that I lost a 70/30, I guess. Not that I'd post every 70/30 here or anything; this simply was the worst call I've ever seen.

EscapePlan9 07-08-2006 05:58 PM

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers (worst ever?)
 
[ QUOTE ]
he knew the 4 was coming, you need to stop thinking about what he had preflop and work on your flop, turn, and rivers

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree. This week I really need to improve on outflopping my opponents.

Isn't it illegal if the villain doesn't tell you he's a psychic, has a pattern mapper, or whatever? I mean, that just isn't fair.

bigt2k4 07-08-2006 05:59 PM

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers
 
[ QUOTE ]
I knew the villain was very loose, like 50/13 or whatever, but he's folded to my raises before, so I really didn't expect him to call here.

[ QUOTE ]

What forum do you think you are in?

[/ QUOTE ]

I wasn't sure whether this would be better in STT or here. Variance in the sense that I lost a 70/30, I guess. Not that I'd post every 70/30 here or anything; this simply was the worst call I've ever seen.

[/ QUOTE ]

worst call ever? Dude Ive seen people call money while playing the board on the river when 9 high would beat them

EscapePlan9 07-08-2006 06:06 PM

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers
 
In this situation... yes, worst call ever. I'm talking pre-flop here. I have never seen someone limp, then call a substantial raise all-in for half their stack while heads-up with 54s.

There's very ways it could have been worse - 53, 52, 43, 42, 32. And I've never seen those yet. So... worst call ever. Show me someone calling with one of those worse hands in this situation.

bigt2k4 07-08-2006 06:18 PM

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers
 
dude I clearly made the correct call, and imho it was a great call and you got pwn3d, therefore it cannot possibly be thought of as a bad call.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.