Re: FullTiltPoker review (advertising works)
 

[ QUOTE ]

I'm a low stakes player and found the games even softer at FTP than at Pokerroom.

[/ QUOTE ]

Then you would have loved it a few months ago. Lots of loose passive play at the 2/4 NL tables. I find that games got much more serious in the last couple of months. Now I get my a.ss thoroughly kicked even at the 1/2 level.

Re: FullTiltPoker review (advertising works)
 

[ QUOTE ]
EJXDT wrote:[ QUOTE ]
An earlier post suggested that FullTilt gives new players better cards.

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't believe that antidotal BS. I've yet to see anyone give proof to these type of conspiracy theory claims and there are plenty of solid reasons why a site wouldn't do this.

EJXDT wrote:[ QUOTE ]
That's not entirely true because through my first 169 hands I did not receive TT, JJ, QQ, KK, AA, or AK once, and AA, KK, AK should happen at least 1/50.


[/ QUOTE ]

Sigh...

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL! Dude, chill out... I was just joking around because I think people who think poker's fixed are stupid. The only people more stupid than the people who think poker is fixed is the people who think poker is fixed and PLAY ANYWAY.

Re: FullTiltPoker review (advertising works)
 

I've been a big FT supporter since they released the Mac client (which should go to show the other sites that it's not that hard).

I also like that people try and play seriously even in their cheapest tourneys, whereas other sites are filled with "double or bust" early-level donkeys. Makes it more of a learning experience.

The unmentionable doesn't hurt either.

And I agree that you need a two-button mouse. Even Apple makes one now.