Re: Haven\'t played or posted in a while (trips 3/6)
 

I'd just call, but I bet the turn every time.

Re: Haven\'t played or posted in a while (trips 3/6)
 

shove

Re: Haven\'t played or posted in a while (trips 3/6)
 

Just calling wouldn't be too bad. If you did elect to raise, $375.

Re: Haven\'t played or posted in a while (trips 3/6)
 

[ QUOTE ]

bet turn. as played, wtf, how is folding an option, obv call.

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: Haven\'t played or posted in a while (trips 3/6)
 

$444. id call a shove too fwiw.

Re: Haven\'t played or posted in a while (trips 3/6)
 

twp, im convinced you're a troll. thisi s either a 3bet or a call.

Re: Haven\'t played or posted in a while (trips 3/6)
 

[ QUOTE ]
twp, im convinced you're a troll. thisi s either a 3bet or a call.

[/ QUOTE ]

ironic bc the main characteristic ive noticed of you as a poster is that you pretty much always agree with twp.

Re: Haven\'t played or posted in a while (trips 3/6)
 

min 3-bet and fold to shove (but call min 4-bet).

Re: Haven\'t played or posted in a while (trips 3/6)
 

reraise to $400-$500 and snap call push. if he's made overbets in the past, he's likely doing it again with monsters, so i'd rule out a boat. ruling it out will never be 100% correct results wise, but theory wise i think so.


edit: when i say snap call, it's becuase you know given his hand range, his potential '[censored] it im drunk' or '[censored] it i want to go get dinner' and so getting such good odds it makes it a 'urgh, didnt want him to shove but i got to call anyway'

Re: Haven\'t played or posted in a while (trips 3/6)
 

i'd shove but a call might be better