Re: 33$ - Squeezing KQs
 

I would like it on FTP or if he raised smaller as played fold.

Re: 33$ - Squeezing KQs
 

[ QUOTE ]
readless i'm sort of indifferent. having said that, i think you need reads, particularly on MP2.

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: 33$ - Squeezing KQs
 

[ QUOTE ]
I would like it on FTP or if he raised smaller as played fold.

[/ QUOTE ]



i know i already quoted wiggs but i agree with both of these statements to some extent. i know im weird.

Re: 33$ - Squeezing KQs
 

[ QUOTE ]
readless i'm sort of indifferent. having said that, i think you need reads, particularly on MP2.

[/ QUOTE ]

Would you guys shove it in the BB (no reeds)?

Re: 33$ - Squeezing KQs
 

it's possible that with an oboe i would shove, otherwise fold.

Re: 33$ - Squeezing KQs
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I would like it on FTP or if he raised smaller as played fold.

[/ QUOTE ]



i know i already quoted wiggs but i agree with both of these statements to some extent. i know im weird.

[/ QUOTE ]

Could you explain why you'd like it better at FTP?

Re: 33$ - Squeezing KQs
 

Something to do with hitting the pot button?

Re: 33$ - Squeezing KQs
 

[ QUOTE ]
Something to do with hitting the pot button?

[/ QUOTE ]


bingo, it auto-widens ranges enough that a lot of people would like sence's line. unless pudge had another idea in mind...

Re: 33$ - Squeezing KQs
 

Since this is Party MP2 probly checked the preselect pot button. You really gotta have reads, games are so soft that imo you should never do anything out of the ordinary if you don't know it's +ev for sure.

Re: 33$ - Squeezing KQs
 

So why did you used to play on stars?