Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=41)
-   -   FT200 bottom set is not the nuts (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=555018)

thac 11-30-2007 03:00 PM

Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts
 
Bump to see if villain showed up with 44

ikestoys 11-30-2007 03:05 PM

Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts
 
tbh nielso, i can't think of a person on this entire forum more intellectually dishonest than you.

just stating what your image is here

nazahl 11-30-2007 03:11 PM

Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts
 
[ QUOTE ]
tbh nielso, i can't think of a person on this entire forum more intellectually dishonest than you.

just stating what your image is here

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

Nick Royale 11-30-2007 03:14 PM

Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts
 
Whoa.

ikestoys 11-30-2007 03:16 PM

Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts
 
From every post being about how you played it a hand in a non std way (yet brilliantly) to using your blog as a cite in politics forum... i just can't think of anyone else who pulls this kind of crap week in week out

tubasteve 11-30-2007 03:27 PM

Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts
 
um, raise somewhere. this is so so gross. how could you ever think just calling the river would be ok? this guy raised UTG then fired 3 streets, his range includes all kinds of stuff you beat that isn't folding.

Paul Thomson 11-30-2007 03:31 PM

Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts
 
[ QUOTE ]
euh super easy shove why can't he valuebet worse? he's never folding a made hand when he gets like 90:300


Board: Tc 2h 9d Qc 4h
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 46.429% 46.43% 00.00% 13 0.00 { QQ+, TT-99, AQs, KJs }
Hand 1: 53.571% 53.57% 00.00% 15 0.00 { 2c2s }

AQs = discounting AQ by a lot
and this is pretty much the absolute worst case scenario for us
KJs has to be discounted bc of preflop (and he might have QTs too if he plays KJs) and sets have to be discounted because imho he valuebets them harder

[/ QUOTE ]

kaby - u want to be ahead of his CALLING RANGE more than 50%

ikestoys 11-30-2007 03:35 PM

Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
euh super easy shove why can't he valuebet worse? he's never folding a made hand when he gets like 90:300


Board: Tc 2h 9d Qc 4h
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 46.429% 46.43% 00.00% 13 0.00 { QQ+, TT-99, AQs, KJs }
Hand 1: 53.571% 53.57% 00.00% 15 0.00 { 2c2s }

AQs = discounting AQ by a lot
and this is pretty much the absolute worst case scenario for us
KJs has to be discounted bc of preflop (and he might have QTs too if he plays KJs) and sets have to be discounted because imho he valuebets them harder

[/ QUOTE ]

kaby - u want to be ahead of his CALLING RANGE more than 50%

[/ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
everything that bets the river that isn't a complete bluff is calling a shove wth

he will get 90:500 odds ..................

[/ QUOTE ]

AZDezertRat 11-30-2007 03:41 PM

Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts
 
Shove the river... with that pot hes calling with a lot that you beat

Uncle R is one of the better players but will call to light on the river

Imrahil 11-30-2007 03:51 PM

Re: FT200 bottom set is not the nuts
 
Bottom set is better than top set so SHOVE RIVER


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.