Two Plus Two Newer Archives - 200 NL - Would you make this river call?

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)

- Full Ring (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=80)

- - 200 NL - Would you make this river call? (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=465433)

Re: 200 NL - Would you make this river call?

[ QUOTE ]
I think I'm supposed to call if I believe villain is bluffing x times/10. However, I don't know what that number is based upon getting laid 3:1 on the river. That was my real question, I know 9/10 I should fold this hand, which I did.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't really think there is anytime you call this. A4 even beats you now, you are thoroughly dominated more than 9/10 times.

Re: 200 NL - Would you make this river call?

No one has mentioned pre-flop yet?

Raise pre-flop!

Oh, and easiest river fold ever.

Re: 200 NL - Would you make this river call?

villian can have AQ or KQ which you cant beat. he could also made a street or had the set, so easy fold

Re: 200 NL - Would you make this river call?

[ QUOTE ]
I think I'm supposed to call if I believe villain is bluffing x times/10. However, I don't know what that number is based upon getting laid 3:1 on the river. That was my real question

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok, that´s pretty easy. It´s only your potential call that can still go into the pot. So it goes like

Money.of.your.call / (Current.Pot + Money.of.your.call)

When it´s like 0.268 then you have to multiply by 100 to put that "%" behind it. So e.g. 0,11 is 11%.

That means in this hand you need to be good >=27% of the time. (Certainly not.)

Another way to do the maths takes the pot odds numbers. When it´s like y:x against you, then it is

x / y+x

which is 25% here, as your 3:1 is a rough estimation.

Hope I was helpfull (and didn´t make any mistakes, I´m a bit in a hurry).
Also hope I got a kind of notation that can be understood. I´m German and I´m not actually sure wether or not equations are to put down in the same style in English.