Re: you guys are ugly
 

[ QUOTE ]
Who said I was c/r'ng to get called?

[/ QUOTE ]

wow man, lol at the idea of c/r bluffing here (which is what you are trying to do if you aren't trying to get called...)

just bet 400, fold shove

Re: you guys are ugly
 

Did you ever think that maybe......he was bluffing.

Re: you guys are ugly
 

[ QUOTE ]
Who said I was c/r'ng to get called?

[/ QUOTE ]

rofl

Can we get a new 2p2 "trendy" them please?

Re: you guys are ugly
 

[ QUOTE ]
Did you ever think that maybe......he was bluffing.

[/ QUOTE ]

So whenever you think someone is bluffing you shove on them so they will fold?

Re: you guys are ugly
 

[ QUOTE ]
Who said I was c/r'ng to get called?

[/ QUOTE ]

you are,

[ QUOTE ]
You are more likely to get value from a c/r then you are from extracting from a straight up value bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

moron

Re: you guys are ugly
 

AE, I think you have to value bet vs A8 or w/e and fold to a shove that called w/ the draw on turn.

Re: you guys are ugly
 

[ QUOTE ]
Did you ever think that maybe......he was bluffing.

[/ QUOTE ]

So you're checkraising to get him to fold a hand you already were beating, and call/shove with better. Awesome.

Re: you guys are ugly
 

[ QUOTE ]
390 fold

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: you guys are ugly
 

Wow with all the hate...

Nutsflopper,

STFU.

All,

I don't see why it is so far fetched that if we bet the river, he may fold but if we check the river, he may bluff or bet with an inferior hand. Thus, we gain no value on a bet but do on a c/r. I am not trying to make a better hand fold. I am trying to make a worse hand bet.

Just to add--I don't find myself calling people names on these boards if/when I don't agree with your opinions. And I don't agree with many of you quite often. Extend the same courtesy please.

Re: you guys are ugly
 

but WHY arent u c/c instead of c/r?