Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Medium Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=58)
-   -   Post-legislation achievable winrates? (5/10) (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=300568)

CopTHIS 01-07-2007 04:23 PM

Re: Post-legislation achievable winrates? (5/10)
 
[ QUOTE ]
30k hands. lol.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah really. I'm at over 10 for my last 40k hands at 5/10 but so what, it's obviously just variance. I could go another 40k hands of good cards, or have a 30k hand break even run.

True 01-07-2007 04:39 PM

Re: Post-legislation achievable winrates? (5/10)
 
w/e 100k is a decent amount

Born2DogBaby 01-07-2007 04:46 PM

Re: Post-legislation achievable winrates? (5/10)
 
100k hands is most def not a decent amount.

True 01-07-2007 05:06 PM

Re: Post-legislation achievable winrates? (5/10)
 
[ QUOTE ]
100k hands is most def not a decent amount.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol, this is so dumb, if anyone has 100k at 5+ at a limit they are probably just moved up, and over 100k your winrate would have changed substantially from the start to the end.

MTBlue 01-08-2007 01:46 AM

Re: Post-legislation achievable winrates? (5/10)
 
Honestly worrying the best achievable winrate isn't worth the time. The only players on that list who have an easily copied style are BoostedJ and Le77er. The top of that list requires a ton of creativity that one can't copy. Try playing like Stoplose or Lolo for a week. You'll realize that they are freakishly good players, whose style is fluid enough that it isn't easily reproducable.

As for the postban winrates its only been two months and you are going to see players at the top who won the "variance lottery." I would be surpised if more than 10 players playing 5/10 have logged 80K+ hands post ban.

If you're looking to improve take a good look at how BoostedJ and Le77er played.

Senor Choppy 01-08-2007 02:27 AM

Re: Post-legislation achievable winrates? (5/10)
 
[ QUOTE ]
30k hands. lol.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's not like he started a thread talking about his longterm winrate, he just answered a guys question with his results.

MDMA 01-08-2007 02:32 AM

Re: Post-legislation achievable winrates? (5/10)
 
This thread sucks.

Gary Stevenson 01-08-2007 04:39 AM

Re: Post-legislation achievable winrates? (5/10)
 
[ QUOTE ]
Honestly worrying the best achievable winrate isn't worth the time.

[/ QUOTE ]
true

[ QUOTE ]
I would be surpised if more than 10 players playing 5/10 have logged 80K+ hands post ban.

[/ QUOTE ]
are you only talking about party?
i've played over 80k hands at 5-10 since the ban and i'm pretty sure there are a bunch of players who play a lot more than i do

Born2DogBaby 01-08-2007 04:52 AM

Re: Post-legislation achievable winrates? (5/10)
 
[ QUOTE ]
I have been out of town but after I finish importing the last 10-15 days of Stars 5/10 hands I will look at the biggest winners since end of november and report back

[/ QUOTE ]
please do sir, then something useful will come out of this thread

jsnipes28 01-09-2007 05:59 PM

Re: Post-legislation achievable winrates? (5/10)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I have been out of town but after I finish importing the last 10-15 days of Stars 5/10 hands I will look at the biggest winners since end of november and report back

[/ QUOTE ]
please do sir, then something useful will come out of this thread

[/ QUOTE ]

this is most hands excluding like 4 random days from december and is current through jan.8th.
3/6 and 5/10nl

it is sorted by most hands played
http://img116.imageshack.us/img116/9...screensut8.png


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.