Re: Play for 2nd or play to win?
 

very easy shove against somewhat good players. if they are both bad i guess limping is okay but id never do it

Re: Play for 2nd or play to win?
 

i also think most people in this thread are overvaluing knocking out 3rd and undervaluing picking up 600 chips

Re: Play for 2nd or play to win?
 

[ QUOTE ]
i also think most people in this thread are overvaluing knocking out 3rd and undervaluing picking up 600 chips

[/ QUOTE ]

There is so little value in the 600 chips here that winning the hand there shouldn't be a goal. Limping 200 to see a flop or see SB shove his remaining 400 in is worth the 10% or your stack.

If BB shoves, so be it. You don't have to call, and shorty is already AI (or should be).

Getting H/U on this hand is your goal, not winning chips.

Re: Play for 2nd or play to win?
 

easiest limp ever.....

Re: Play for 2nd or play to win?
 

I limp here too and hope it gets checked down where I have the winner.

Re: Play for 2nd or play to win?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i also think most people in this thread are overvaluing knocking out 3rd and undervaluing picking up 600 chips

[/ QUOTE ]

There is so little value in the 600 chips here that winning the hand there shouldn't be a goal. Limping 200 to see a flop or see SB shove his remaining 400 in is worth the 10% or your stack.

If BB shoves, so be it. You don't have to call, and shorty is already AI (or should be).

Getting H/U on this hand is your goal, not winning chips.

[/ QUOTE ]

using sngwiz, and with SB calling 100% i cant get this to be worse than a +.75% edge no matter what BB calls with. with SB on 74% and BB call1% at 28% i cant get it worse than +.82% no matter what call2% is.

so yea its a matter of if limping is better than pushing. but i dont think you can pass up an edge of almost 1%, especially since this isnt sngpt and overcalls are already factored in. unless im using sngwiz wrong it looks like a push

Re: Play for 2nd or play to win?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i also think most people in this thread are overvaluing knocking out 3rd and undervaluing picking up 600 chips

[/ QUOTE ]

There is so little value in the 600 chips here that winning the hand there shouldn't be a goal. Limping 200 to see a flop or see SB shove his remaining 400 in is worth the 10% or your stack.

If BB shoves, so be it. You don't have to call, and shorty is already AI (or should be).

Getting H/U on this hand is your goal, not winning chips.

[/ QUOTE ]

using sngwiz, and with SB calling 100% i cant get this to be worse than a +.75% edge no matter what BB calls with. with SB on 74% and BB call1% at 28% i cant get it worse than +.82% no matter what call2% is.

so yea its a matter of if limping is better than pushing. but i dont think you can pass up an edge of almost 1%, especially since this isnt sngpt and overcalls are already factored in. unless im using sngwiz wrong it looks like a push

[/ QUOTE ]

wherever I set on sngwiz , it tells me fold.
What numbers are you setting?

Re: Play for 2nd or play to win?
 

uh.. the numbers i said i set...


like SB call1% on 75%, BB call1% on 30% and call2% on 25% gives you a +.8% push, right?

Re: Play for 2nd or play to win?
 

I didnt set chip equity mode.
SB 100%
BB 100%

Is a push , I think Im doing something wrong. It has not sense

Re: Play for 2nd or play to win?
 

[ QUOTE ]
I didnt set chip equity mode.
SB 100%
BB 100%

Is a push , I think Im doing something wrong. It has not sense

[/ QUOTE ]

you shouldnt be in chip equity mode i dont think. i dont know how to change the stuff im just in the default. which is $EV not cEV im assuming