Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=41)
-   -   50k hands of NL100 - stat check (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=550337)

h_ven 11-20-2007 01:34 AM

Re: 50k hands of NL100 - stat check
 
Whats your multi-table ratio and where do you play at?

Could you post your position stats?

Looks very solid so far, keep it up.

dirtylobster 11-20-2007 01:40 AM

Re: 50k hands of NL100 - stat check
 
[ QUOTE ]
Whats your multi-table ratio and where do you play at?

Could you post your position stats?

Looks very solid so far, keep it up.

[/ QUOTE ]

http://img409.imageshack.us/img409/7642/50kposln1.jpg

I seem to lose from UTG. Biggest losers AA/AJo/QQ/AQs. Variance probably?

I play at Stars, MT ratio is 2.97.

Josem 11-20-2007 01:46 AM

Re: 50k hands of NL100 - stat check
 
i suspect that you open your range just a little too much when the pot is unopened to you on the button, and not enough over limpers.

h_ven 11-20-2007 01:49 AM

Re: 50k hands of NL100 - stat check
 
[ QUOTE ]
I seem to lose from UTG. Biggest losers AA/AJo/QQ/AQs. Variance probably?

[/ QUOTE ]
It's gotta be, I don't think playing AA and QQ from UTG is loose, obv.
Maybe AJo is a little loose, but if you're playing 24/20 you're obviously not folding AJ anywhere. I tend to overplay AKs and AQs as their winrates are slightly smaller AKo and AQo.

You must put in some big hours if you got 40K hands in one month 3 tabling. Maybe I need to lower my # of tables and concentrate on playing better.

dirtylobster 11-20-2007 01:51 AM

Re: 50k hands of NL100 - stat check
 
Fair point, but I try to table select so I have tight players in the blinds and fish on my right so with an optimal table I can steal the blinds with any two cards. Are you referring to "attempt to steal blinds"?

dirtylobster 11-20-2007 01:53 AM

Re: 50k hands of NL100 - stat check
 
[ QUOTE ]
You must put in some big hours if you got 40K hands in one month 3 tabling. Maybe I need to lower my # of tables and concentrate on playing better.

[/ QUOTE ]

According to PT I play 8h/day on average. I realized around two months ago that I can't focus well with 4+ tables so I've just accepted that.

Josem 11-20-2007 01:54 AM

Re: 50k hands of NL100 - stat check
 
[ QUOTE ]
Fair point, but I try to table select so I have tight players in the blinds and fish on my right so with an optimal table I can steal the blinds with any two cards. Are you referring to "attempt to steal blinds"?

[/ QUOTE ]

yes, i was.

while table selection is awesome (and i'm a big fan of it), i think you're being excessively discerning if you're this fussy.

dirtylobster 11-20-2007 01:55 AM

Re: 50k hands of NL100 - stat check
 
I mainly 4-table but I actively table select so I often have only 3 tables running and sometimes I'm down to 2. If I don't find good games I fill up with either NL50 or NL200 (when I feel I'm playing/running good).

nazahl 11-20-2007 01:56 AM

Re: 50k hands of NL100 - stat check
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You must put in some big hours if you got 40K hands in one month 3 tabling. Maybe I need to lower my # of tables and concentrate on playing better.

[/ QUOTE ]

According to PT I play 8h/day on average. I realized around two months ago that I can't focus well with 4+ tables so I've just accepted that.

[/ QUOTE ]

jesus

dirtylobster 11-20-2007 01:57 AM

Re: 50k hands of NL100 - stat check
 
[ QUOTE ]
while table selection is awesome (and i'm a big fan of it), i think you're being excessively discerning if you're this fussy.

[/ QUOTE ]

As I just said my play starts to detoriate with over 4 tables so I compensate by table selecting. I've also noticed that having fish to my left can tilt me very hard.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.