Re: 100nl FH in limped pot
 

Jam,

You never see k,6 3 bet here?

Re: 100nl FH in limped pot
 

[ QUOTE ]
Jam,

You never see k,6 3 bet here?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, but it's vanishingly rare. Maybe it's more likely at 100NL, but the guy has to be an drooler and very aggressive.

Re: 100nl FH in limped pot
 

Fistpump all-in.



Jamo, you missed 45 in the range. And 62 as well.

Re: 100nl FH in limped pot
 

[ QUOTE ]
Fistpump all-in.



Jamo, you missed 45 in the range. And 62 as well.

[/ QUOTE ]

we have 50% equity with another 62 [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

the odds of 45 playing like this are just not enough to shove.

Re: 100nl FH in limped pot
 

You expect a 44/2 player to fold 45 just because the board is paired..?

Re: 100nl FH in limped pot
 

I disagree. I totally see a 40%vpip playing 45 like this. Why would he not?

Re: 100nl FH in limped pot
 

I'm not sure if you are replying to me or Caterp, but that was my point, it's teh nuts to him, even with a paired board.

Re: 100nl FH in limped pot
 

It says Re: CAterp.

Re: 100nl FH in limped pot
 

[ QUOTE ]
raising turn is meh

[/ QUOTE ]

What's wrong with a turn raise? I like a turn raise to extract a bit from the guy who checked his A on the flop.

As played, I just call river.

Re: El Diablo
 

[ QUOTE ]

I disagree. I totally see a 40%vpip playing 45 like this. Why would he not?

[/ QUOTE ]

Because, in practise, they don't. River 3-bets are enormously strong.

edit: especially with 0.5 AF