Re: Whose Career would you rather have?
 

Jeter is the easiest choice ever. most overpaid player in baseball (he's good, but not $18m or whatever good), all those rings, all those women. plus he's likable.

Re: Whose Career would you rather have?
 

Does this include $ made, bangability, etc?

Re: Whose Career would you rather have?
 

Bradshaw, Bradshaw, Bonds.

Re: Whose Career would you rather have?
 

Horry (but it's close), Bradshaw, and in the easiest choice ever, Jeter.

Re: Whose Career would you rather have?
 

If I choose Bradshaw, do I have to have the crappy acting career after I'm done with football?

Re: Whose Career would you rather have?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Does this include $ made, bangability, etc?

[/ QUOTE ]

Depends on which one you want to bang.

Re: Whose Career would you rather have?
 

Don't people want to be known as the better player? Ewing, Marino, and Bonds are surely recognized as better players than Horry, Bradshaw, and Jeter.

Re: Whose Career would you rather have?
 

Horry, He was a laker and won a ton of rings. I would be much happier having his career than ewing.

Bradshaw, a career with that many superbowls is too hard to pass up on.

Bonds, I would not want to play for the Yankees. Plus it would be pretty sweet to be going for the HR record.

Re: Whose Career would you rather have?
 

Horry

Bradshaw

Bonds

Re: Whose Career would you rather have?
 

I voted Horry, Bradshaw, Jeter. I don't think it's close.

Bonds is the closest, because baseball is the sport where an individual legacy can be separated from team success most easily, and his individual accomplishments are so memorable/highly valued. Marino's lack of a super bowl hurts his legacy as a QB more than Bonds' lack of a ring.