Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=41)
-   -   Need river line (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=557139)

Nick Royale 11-29-2007 11:08 AM

Re: Need river line
 
[ QUOTE ]
You don't think i fold out a couple of better hands by betting?

[/ QUOTE ]
No, I think you've got a better chance of getting called by worse than getting better to fold, but I really don't like a bet however.

Daddy Warbucks 11-29-2007 11:09 AM

Re: Need river line
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You don't think i fold out a couple of better hands by betting?

[/ QUOTE ]

unlikely, because he checked behind the turn, which is the potcontroll/bluffinduce line

[/ QUOTE ]

It could also be a whole range of pocket pairs.

wuwei 11-29-2007 11:13 AM

Re: Need river line
 
[ QUOTE ]
You don't think i fold out a couple of better hands by betting?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't see how you can ever fold a better hand here, and I think it's pretty unlikely you fold a chop either.

I can go either way on the river, without a read on his aggression level. c/c was my first instinct, but I could see a bet. I don't like a c/f.

Noam Chomsky 11-29-2007 11:14 AM

Re: Need river line
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You don't think i fold out a couple of better hands by betting?

[/ QUOTE ]

unlikely, because he checked behind the turn, which is the potcontroll/bluffinduce line

[/ QUOTE ]

It could also be a whole range of pocket pairs.

[/ QUOTE ]

if you're thinking you can fold out 99-QQ by betting here vs some loose passive player you're wrong.

Daddy Warbucks 11-29-2007 11:42 AM

Re: Need river line
 
[ QUOTE ]

if you're thinking you can fold out 99-QQ by betting here vs some loose passive player you're wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, apparently......

scallop 11-29-2007 11:49 AM

Re: Need river line
 
I would lean towards ch/call. We catch diamonds, and other random bluffs.

I dont mind ch/fold tho.

I'm torn. Betting sucks tho.

Nick Royale 11-29-2007 11:50 AM

Re: Need river line
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

if you're thinking you can fold out 99-QQ by betting here vs some loose passive player you're wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, apparently......

[/ QUOTE ]
I don't know if you're sarcastic, but there's really no way he's folding 99-QQ. You'll have a better chance of him calling with 77-.

JFsports 11-29-2007 11:52 AM

Re: Need river line
 
I really don't like betting here. Seems like a 'no better hand folds, no worse hand calls' spot. Although you may occasionally get called by worse by a bad/loose player.

I'm not sure whether I'd c/c or c/f, depends on bet size/maybe timing

B5k 11-29-2007 12:08 PM

Re: Need river line
 
fold preflop, no good stack sizer here for SC IMO.

as played, I'd probably c/c river

Daddy Warbucks 11-29-2007 12:10 PM

Re: Need river line
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

if you're thinking you can fold out 99-QQ by betting here vs some loose passive player you're wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, apparently......

[/ QUOTE ]
I don't know if you're sarcastic, but there's really no way he's folding 99-QQ. You'll have a better chance of him calling with 77-.

[/ QUOTE ]

No i mean he timed down and called with JJ.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.