Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Medium Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=58)
-   -   400nl big fold vs. tufts (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=554862)

xorbie 11-27-2007 09:23 AM

Re: 400nl big fold vs. tufts
 
ugh nononono.

willw9 11-27-2007 09:33 AM

Re: 400nl big fold vs. tufts
 
What'd you have tufts?

wuwei 11-27-2007 10:45 AM

Re: 400nl big fold vs. tufts
 
[ QUOTE ]
Not really a big fold but a good fold nonetheless. Very few opponents are capable of taking this line with worse (and the ones that are are either really good or really bad). I would never call this against anybody who I believe to be inbetween those two.

[/ QUOTE ]

I've taken this line before with a hand like 88-TT, against an aggressive villain that will fire 2-3 barrels. I don't think we ever get raised by a bluff, and we avoid calling a pot sized bet if we're committed to showing down. There are some issues with this line, but if we just don't know about his frequencies for betting the river with better or worse hands, the block seems useful.

I know I'm not a really good player, but I don't think I'm bad either. Thoughts on my thoughts?

nuggetz87 11-27-2007 10:54 AM

Re: 400nl big fold vs. tufts
 
i like how everyone before his reply says good fold and everyone after says clear blocking bet...

tuuufts 11-27-2007 10:59 AM

Re: 400nl big fold vs. tufts
 
fwiw i think "blocking" this river with 88-TT is terrible. i had 66 and it was 100% a bluff in my mind. flame away...

AcTiOnJaCsOn 11-27-2007 11:32 AM

Re: 400nl big fold vs. tufts
 
[ QUOTE ]
fwiw i think "blocking" this river with 88-TT is terrible. i had 66 and it was 100% a bluff in my mind. flame away...

[/ QUOTE ]
this is a pretty bad play with 66 although i guess it worked, op might have had the player wrongly described, since its really rare to see normal tags show up with 66 and stuff here.

tuuufts 11-27-2007 12:42 PM

Re: 400nl big fold vs. tufts
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
fwiw i think "blocking" this river with 88-TT is terrible. i had 66 and it was 100% a bluff in my mind. flame away...

[/ QUOTE ]
this is a pretty bad play with 66 although i guess it worked, op might have had the player wrongly described, since its really rare to see normal tags show up with 66 and stuff here.

[/ QUOTE ]

i guess you can cross me off the "normal tag" list then

luegofuego 11-27-2007 01:25 PM

Re: 400nl big fold vs. tufts
 
wtf? we where debating calling? raising is way better in that case.

AcTiOnJaCsOn 11-27-2007 01:33 PM

Re: 400nl big fold vs. tufts
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
fwiw i think "blocking" this river with 88-TT is terrible. i had 66 and it was 100% a bluff in my mind. flame away...

[/ QUOTE ]
this is a pretty bad play with 66 although i guess it worked, op might have had the player wrongly described, since its really rare to see normal tags show up with 66 and stuff here.

[/ QUOTE ]

i guess you can cross me off the "normal tag" list then

[/ QUOTE ]
done [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

pdoran10 11-27-2007 01:51 PM

Re: 400nl big fold vs. tufts
 
[ QUOTE ]
i like how everyone before his reply says good fold and everyone after says clear blocking bet...

[/ QUOTE ]

meh, just saying that tufts is c/c two streets with something that beats KK like never on this board. but yeah hindsight is 20/20 [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.