Re: 600NL: To fire a 3rd?
 

you can add more diamonds, i dont think it changes the end decision. could be wrong.

Re: 600NL: To fire a 3rd?
 

[ QUOTE ]
you can add more diamonds, i dont think it changes the end decision. could be wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

we win if he has diamonds no matter what we do (except diamonds with the 8d). i don't like the push at all though. i'm not convinced he folds a Q all the time and we know that he's passive, so he can have a K.

Re: 600NL: To fire a 3rd?
 

I'd give up on the river.

Re: 600NL: To fire a 3rd?
 

So what I am getting from this thread is that the turn bet was aweful (which I figured) and the river bet was so/so-bad.?

Re: 600NL: To fire a 3rd?
 

I heard somewhere that if the opponent has a better hand than us and does not want to fold we should not bet?

Re: 600NL: To fire a 3rd?
 

[ QUOTE ]
I heard somewhere that if the opponent has a better hand than us and does not want to fold we should not bet?

[/ QUOTE ]

Why don't you work on some quality posts before you attempt sarcasm or whatever this is here. It's not funny or insightful. I'm not sure what you are going for, but it isn't working.

Re: 600NL: To fire a 3rd?
 

The main problem I see with the turn bet is that we expect TAGs and normal players to potentially fold a queen or a lower pair. However, this player could call you down real light... on the other hand if he did float lightly on the flop he could be willing to give it up on the turn.

Re: 600NL: To fire a 3rd?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I heard somewhere that if the opponent has a better hand than us and does not want to fold we should not bet?

[/ QUOTE ]

Why don't you work on some quality posts before you attempt sarcasm or whatever this is here. It's not funny or insightful. I'm not sure what you are going for, but it isn't working.

[/ QUOTE ]

ive actually agreed with all his recent posts. hes a better poster than 99% of the forum.