Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
 

I ran at 36% over my first 500 33s at party.
No, it's not my true roi.
/discussion

Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
 

[ QUOTE ]
what is your SN? Why do you keep avoiding that question.

[/ QUOTE ]

you missed it. it was trixy&false

Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
 

[ QUOTE ]
I ran at 36% over my first 500 33s at party.
Yes, it's my true roi.
/discussion

[/ QUOTE ]
FYP

Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It's impossible to be > 20% in the 16s imho

[/ QUOTE ]

Well its clearly not impossible as Im doing it.

[/ QUOTE ]

You haven't even played 500 tournies.
[censored] artard.

[/ QUOTE ]



If you want to put some money up on my ability to maintain a 20% ROI over a certain number of $16 SNGs im willing to do that.

[/ QUOTE ]

how much can you afford to bet?

Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I ran at 36% over my first 500 33s at party.
Yes, it's my true roi.
/discussion

[/ QUOTE ]
FYP

[/ QUOTE ]
oh what a wonderful world that would be!

Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
what is your SN? Why do you keep avoiding that question.

[/ QUOTE ]

you missed it. it was trixy&false

[/ QUOTE ]

ty sir

Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
 

[ QUOTE ]
But im glad that you think that 1000 is a meaningful number as Im now closing in on 1000 ( im currently at 976) and my overall ROI is 39%.

[/ QUOTE ]

Clearly this isn't 1000 $16 SNGs. Filter the results.

Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It's impossible to be > 20% in the 16s imho

[/ QUOTE ]

Well its clearly not impossible as Im doing it.

[/ QUOTE ]

You haven't even played 500 tournies.
[censored] artard.

[/ QUOTE ]

speaking of retard, this is a very stupid line of thinking. Who the heck is going to continue at a level that theyre beating for over 20% ROI for 2000 SNGs? (or whatever sample size makes you happy, maybe 5000).

If you want to put some money up on my ability to maintain a 20% ROI over a certain number of $16 SNGs im willing to do that.

I love how regulars here turn into old coots when they here about a small sample size. "500?!! Why I remember once back in 1923, spacegravy himself had a losing period much longer than 500, clearly your results are meaningless son."

So do enlighten me, at what point do my results become meaningfull?

[/ QUOTE ]

How's a $500 even money bet that you can't run at >20% ROI in the Stars $16 NLH 9-man SnGs for the first 1000 you play, starting Dec 1st?

[/ QUOTE ]

I would make adjustments to this bet. Either Id need much better odds (because conventional wisdom and everybody on here seem to think that this is undoable) or Id want to keep my results so far (which is what I was suggesting at first).

My counter offer is an even money bet that I can finish my first 1000 $16s (starting a couple weeks ago when I started playing them) with an ROI of 20% or greater.

Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
But im glad that you think that 1000 is a meaningful number as Im now closing in on 1000 ( im currently at 976) and my overall ROI is 39%.

[/ QUOTE ]

Clearly this isn't 1000 $16 SNGs. Filter the results.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, I acknowledge that. How the hell do I filter these things on sharkscope?

Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
 

[ QUOTE ]
1000 isn't very meaningful, you stupid [censored].
1000 is just the outlines of our prop bet.

[/ QUOTE ]
Stallowned wrote
[ QUOTE ]
400 games doesn't mean anything. This month I was at 27% ROI over my first 400 6.50s. After my next 170 I'm at 16%.

I'm not sure of what a good sample size is for figuring out your true ROI. I've heard 1000, but I think you need way more than that.

Post Extras:


[/ QUOTE ]

But yeah, i recognize that 1000 isnt a great number either. You still havent answered my question of how many you think is a significant sample.