Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Delmon, Garza and four others in one very big deal

Trade

[/ QUOTE ]

Thats interesting, have to wait to see who got the better end of the deal. Does this mean anything in terms of Santanas possible destination?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think it means anything definitely conclusive, but may point more towards the Yankees, since it's rumored they might include Hughes or Kennedy in such a deal, and there's a greater need for the Twins to collect starters now.

Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***
 

As a Twins fan I'm pretty unsure of this. I think whether this goes down as a good deal for them or not depends a lot on Pridie. He never really did much in the minors until he made AAA this year where he raked for 250ab. Maybe the Twins saw something they liked back in '06 when he was in spring training with them.

If Pridie can be a starting CF for them this year I guess it is a great deal. If he doesn't amount to much, it probably isn't.

Also, I hope they don't think they are getting any kind of slugger in Delmon Young. Hes got potential, but he also has a ways to go before he is even a league average hitter.

Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***
 

LEN3 (the Trib reporter who reported this deal) also said he found out today that the Twins are interested in Aaron Rowand but that it wasn't apparent whether or not they had offered him a contract yet.

Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***
 

[ QUOTE ]
Delmon, Garza and four others in one very big deal

Trade

[/ QUOTE ]

Twins win big, Rays lose big. I don't know why the Rays would sabatoge themselves like this. They get a little better in 2008, by having a true shortstop to play until Brignac is ready, adding another reliever to compliment Percival, Reyes, and Wheeler, and pick up another young starter, even though they've already got two studs and three of the top 15 pitching prospects in baseball. While the Rays have a lot of outfielders, Delmon Young was either their best or second best (Upton). Now they've got to count on Gomes who is OK at best, Baldelli who can't stay healthy, and Dukes who's got to stay out of trouble. Bad bad move for the Rays.

Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***
 

[ QUOTE ]
As a Twins fan I'm pretty unsure of this. I think whether this goes down as a good deal for them or not depends a lot on Pridie. He never really did much in the minors until he made AAA this year where he raked for 250ab. Maybe the Twins saw something they liked back in '06 when he was in spring training with them.

If Pridie can be a starting CF for them this year I guess it is a great deal. If he doesn't amount to much, it probably isn't.

Also, I hope they don't think they are getting any kind of slugger in Delmon Young. Hes got potential, but he also has a ways to go before he is even a league average hitter.

[/ QUOTE ]

Here's the thing with the Twins. Their starting pitching, non Johan division, is Garza, Bonser, Baker, Liriano, and Slowey. If you replace Garza with Perkins, you've still got a damn good unit and Swarzak is knocking on the door (ie. ready, but with no room on the roster). Rincon was fungible for the Twins, in fact even though he's underpaid at $2.8MM was a drag on the payroll. Bartlett is their starting SS, but a mix of Casilla, Punto, and Harris can handle the middle until Trevor Plouffe is ready, which should be opening day 2009 at the latest. The Twins gave up very little here for one of the highest celings in the game.

Pridie is another 4th OF type, although at least he's got the potential to be better. That's not something you could say about the OF on the Twins roster right now.

Since Bartlett is destined to be a 4th IF and Rincon a 4th reliever, basically, for the Rays this deal comes down to Matt Garza for Delmon Young. There is no doubt that Delmon is the better bet going forward (higher ceiling, less injury risk, higher floor), and this is why the Twins win big, and the Rays lose.

Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***
 

I think I'm higher on Garza and lower on Young then you. Maybe I'm weighting their performance this past year a little too much or something... Young has a long way to go (both at the plate and in the field) before he is an average corner outfielder.

/edit and I don't get the whole "until Plouffe is ready" thing. His upside is basically Bartlett.

Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***
 

young was really really bad last year. a lot of the shine is gone there. i know pecota doesn't think too much of him now. maybe he gets good by the time he's expensive just in time for the twins to trade him.

harris is bad enough defensively that he doesn't really have any value. bartlett is significantly better.

Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***
 

Here's my reply on another forum;

[ QUOTE ]
Then trade Dukes and pawn the risk off on someone else. The Rays are gambling waaaaaay too much here, and not only that, they're the ones laying the odds. They now need Dukes to stay out of trouble, Baldelli to stay healthy, and Gomes to be good. None of those are good bets, and they need to hit at least a two player parlay.

On top of that, even if their ceilings were the same (they aren't), Garza is more risky than Delmon. All that risk, for what? A guy who's going to be a fourth infielder in two months and a guy who is arguably their fourth best reliever, even though he's going to make ~$2.8MM. Too much risk, not enough reward to make this worthwhile for the Rays.


[/ QUOTE ]

Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***
 

Young really isn't all that good. His line last year : .288/.316/.408 and his Minor League numbers aren't that far off. He has little, if any, plate discipline and is very overrated, imo. Both Crawford and Upton are better and the Rays can probably scrap together a decent replacement. Loosing Harris and the other prospects, though, I agree is kinda questionable but overall I don't think this is really bad a move. Garza was pretty good last year and is pretty young. He should compliment Shields/Kazmir nicely and give the rays a pretty good rotation to which they can later add the studs they have developing in the minors when they are ready.

Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***
 

I am happy to be rid of Rincon and his salary assuming this goes down.