Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread
 

OK, Semtex and I are betting $100 on the game straight up. I have Oregon and he has Arizona State. He sent me a PM, but I wanted there to be a public record of it.

Transfer on Stars to the winner? I'm thinking that for $100 we probably don't need an escrow and I can just count on your 2+2 rep being worth $100. Deal?

Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
That UCLA game was retarded.

They score on the 3rd play of the game, and from then on don't get into the red zone. The Cougs had the good fortune that their starting QB was out, their top 2 rbs were hurt, and their best WR got hung out to dry and had his chest shattered.

The Cougs played much better, bringing more heat on the QB, but it's easy to do that when UCLA had no wrs to exploit our biggest issue.

To me the lesson here is that UCLA sucks and was hurt, not that the Cougs don't blow or anything.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wazzu might consider blocking the other team's best defensive player when they go for it on fourth down.
Twice, I saw Davis rush through untouched and blow up the Cougs 4th down attempts.
Still a good win for Wazzu.

UCLA definitely earns the most inconsistent team of the year award, which is shocking. Even with the injuries, UCLA had the deepest amount of experienced players in the Pac10. That's something that makes me look real hard at the head coach.

Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread
 

yeah its a deal. i'm probably an idiot for taking this bet from you even after seeing i can get a much more favorable deal from some site but whatever i don't sportsbet. i'll take the bragging rights and $100. loser has to publicly admit the other one is more knowledgeable about pac 10 football?

Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread
 

ucla (-2.5) @ AZ. lol

Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
loser has to publicly admit the other one is more knowledgeable about pac 10 football?

[/ QUOTE ]

If you really think the outcome of this game necessarily shows who is more knowledgeable about football, well, LOL.

If you don't actually think that, why not go for something more outrageous, like "loser has to publicly admit to having the world's largest My Little Pony collection"?

Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
loser has to publicly admit the other one is more knowledgeable about pac 10 football?

[/ QUOTE ]

If you really think the outcome of this game necessarily shows who is more knowledgeable about football, well, LOL.

If you don't actually think that, why not go for something more outrageous, like "loser has to publicly admit to having the world's largest My Little Pony collection"?

[/ QUOTE ]
i'm not that dumb. i figure if we're throwing money down, why not a little humiliation to boot?

Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread
 

How about I just use either an ASU or a USC avatar for a week if ASU wins, and you use a Dennis Dixon avatar for a week if the Ducks win. Sound fair? That will actually be really hard for me to switch my avatar with Georgia Tech coming off a huge win over Virginia Tech.

Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
How about I just use either an ASU or a USC avatar for a week if ASU wins, and you use a Dennis Dixon avatar for a week if the Ducks win. Sound fair? That will actually be really hard for me to switch my avatar with Georgia Tech coming off a huge win over Virginia Tech.

[/ QUOTE ]
haha sounds good

Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How about I just use either an ASU or a USC avatar for a week if ASU wins, and you use a Dennis Dixon avatar for a week if the Ducks win. Sound fair? That will actually be really hard for me to switch my avatar with Georgia Tech coming off a huge win over Virginia Tech.

[/ QUOTE ]
haha sounds good

[/ QUOTE ]

Does this replace the $100 or is it on top of the $100?

Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread
 

On top of the $100, definitely.