Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Sporting Events (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=48)
-   -   ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread*** (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=535342)

gehrig 11-27-2007 05:51 PM

Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***
 
trading morneau for kotchman straight up would be a pretty big win for the twins. factoring in age and defense (kotchman is sick defensively) i don't think there's too big a difference between the two going forward, and kotchman is cheaper and under control for more years

Neuge 11-27-2007 06:07 PM

Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It is easily addressed: trade Dunn.

[/ QUOTE ]
That's trading over 30% of your offense when it's at best unproven Bruce can replace it and Hamilton can hold up for an entire season.

[/ QUOTE ]

You know very little about baseball if you think trading Dunn is bad.

[/ QUOTE ]
Can you make a point instead of just being dismissive and insulting to someone who might disagree with your non-point?

Vyse 11-27-2007 06:08 PM

Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***
 
The point is so obvious that it doesn't need re-stating. I don't like stating the obvious.

Neuge 11-27-2007 06:11 PM

Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***
 
Okay, maybe I'm as stupid as you say, but would you just make the [censored] point already.

slothinator 11-27-2007 06:13 PM

Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***
 
I believe what Vyse is tired of saying is that Dunn is a terrible defensive OF. While he generates lots of runs with his walks and HR, he costs the Reds runs with his D. Is that about right Vyse?

Neuge 11-27-2007 06:18 PM

Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***
 
[ QUOTE ]
I believe what Vyse is tired of saying is that Dunn is a terrible defensive OF. While he generates lots of runs with his walks and HR, he costs the Reds runs with his D. Is that about right Vyse?

[/ QUOTE ]
Even with those adjustments, and they are huge, he's terrible on defense, he's still the second most valuable player on the Reds and a top 5 overall LF in the majors. Maybe I'm wrong and he's just as terrible at 1B, but I think he'd be more valuable there.

EDIT: He's the 3rd most valuable Red, 2nd if were only talking position players.

Vyse 11-27-2007 06:18 PM

Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***
 
pretty much. sloth nailed it. ty.

slothinator 11-27-2007 06:28 PM

Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I believe what Vyse is tired of saying is that Dunn is a terrible defensive OF. While he generates lots of runs with his walks and HR, he costs the Reds runs with his D. Is that about right Vyse?

[/ QUOTE ]
Even with those adjustments, and they are huge, he's terrible on defense, he's still the second most valuable player on the Reds and a top 5 overall LF in the majors. Maybe I'm wrong and he's just as terrible at 1B, but I think he'd be more valuable there.

EDIT: He's the 3rd most valuable Red, 2nd if were only talking position players.

[/ QUOTE ]

Top 5 LF? LF's I would rather have than Adam Dunn:

Manny Ramirez
Hideki Matsui
Carl Crawford
Alfonso Soriano
Carlos Lee
Matt Holliday

No way he's moving to 1B, Votto is going to be there for the next 6 years. That he's the 2nd most valuable Red's everyday player says a lot about the Reds; Good luck, Dusty-still hoping you DIAGF.

Vyse 11-27-2007 06:31 PM

Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***
 
votto might not even be there this year lollerskates

Thremp 11-27-2007 06:34 PM

Re: ***Official 2007-2008 MLB Offseason Thread***
 
Melky + Hughes >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t; Johan

For the Yankees, this may actually be reasonable with their need for wins >90. But still terrible IMO. This is sheer idiocy otherwise.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.