Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Televised Poker (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=39)
-   -   High Stakes Poker thread (9/17) (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=503292)

Vegaas 09-21-2007 03:09 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (9/17)
 
[ QUOTE ]
And what's the guess on the number of players at this table who would be able to beat 0.5/1 NL on PS for a decent winrate?

[/ QUOTE ]

How about 100%

Vegaas 09-21-2007 03:29 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (9/17)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I heard Jen is very loose when off the air

[/ QUOTE ]

After Howard Leaderer & Todd Brunson I guess any girl would be stretched out.

[/ QUOTE ]

So how do you know Howard and Todd are shall we say big stacked?

spino1i 09-23-2007 08:54 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (9/17)
 
Arent they going to reach a point (like around 1200/2400 NL or maybe 1200/2400/with a forced 4800 straddle NL) where the blinds are too high for cash to even play since cash will just get in the way? I mean if its 4800 to go, we are taking a standard pre-flop raise of 18k and the pot can easily get to 80k-ish on the flop. All it takes a little bit of action on the flop and you could easily get 500k+ on the turn and 2m+ on river. I dont think betting 1m in cash is really possible. Anyone else have opinions of this? How far up in stakes can they go and still play cash?

KentuckyWildcats 09-24-2007 01:34 AM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (9/17)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
A bird isn't arrogant for pointing out that they can fly and humans can't.

[/ QUOTE ]

Jamie Gold, ladies and gentlemen: flies like a bird, where mere humans only walk.

http://img75.imageshack.us/img75/8097/goldfly1yn8.jpg

http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/5918/goldfly2gp2.jpg

http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/558/goldfly3qf7.jpg

[/ QUOTE ]

LMAO

ChrisV 09-24-2007 05:59 AM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (9/17)
 
[ QUOTE ]
I'll play you $50/$100 heads up on FullTilt any day of the week. Not wanting to brag, but since your post is implying I'm some kind of fool, let me say that I haven't had a losing heads up session on those stakes at FullTilt in more than two years.

[/ QUOTE ]

http://www.lolcats.com/images/u/07/3...pspt0k87dj.jpg

Edit: It just occurred to me that that statement is consistent with not having played any 50/100 heads up on FT in the last 2 years. So, same, dude!

ChrisV 09-24-2007 06:12 AM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (9/17)
 
[ QUOTE ]
http://img75.imageshack.us/img75/8097/goldfly1yn8.jpg

[/ QUOTE ]

lol nh

MCS 09-24-2007 09:04 AM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (9/17)
 
[ QUOTE ]
Lol that shove is so damn retarted.
I mean sure if you like flip coins 30/70 all day long I'm game but dont claim its a "good strategy" to do so.

[/ QUOTE ]

What if I'm 30/70 but I'm getting paid way more than even money when I win?

I haven't thought about it that much, but I think the pot was like $115,000 after Hellmuth's raise, so Baxter put in $60,000 to win $145,000. He's often more than 60/205 (29%) to win the pot. In that case, folding is out, and calling makes no sense because the money is going in on the turn anyway.

A set is the only hand where Baxter is -EV here, and even then it's okay since he's getting only slightly bad odds, and he has implied tilt odds plus first priority in doing business with Hellmuth. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

This is kind of back of the envelope, but it seems clear to me that the shove is not "so damn retarted," though I know that everyone likes to take really extreme positions on every single play.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.