Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Micro Stakes Limit (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=37)
-   -   Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread) (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=514179)

Aaron W. 10-16-2007 12:59 AM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
It's 10 PM Pacific time. I'm about to one table some more 1/2 fishmax. AIM: airwong4980 if you're interested in sweating.

marchron 10-16-2007 01:07 AM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
[ QUOTE ]
yeah, I love those guys who run around with 60/40/2 stats who complain about getting sucked out and call ppl fish.....

[/ QUOTE ]
That happened to me last night playing at the 2/4 table. Some guy had to be in the 50/30 range and yelled at everyone else for being donks. The best was when he flopped an underpair versus top pair and a flush draw. The card that setted him up on the river made his opponent's flush and they capped that [censored]. At showdown, he said something like "[censored] donk sucked out on me again" and I LOL'd.

Xylocain 10-16-2007 01:35 AM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
[ QUOTE ]
It's 10 PM Pacific time. I'm about to one table some more 1/2 fishmax. AIM: airwong4980 if you're interested in sweating.

[/ QUOTE ]

I dont use AIM but Ill sweat from the side lines a bit. Seems like you found a good table [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

scpi10 10-16-2007 01:58 AM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
How do you get a custom title?

MrWookie 10-16-2007 02:05 AM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
1. Get banned by Wookie
2. ????
3. Get custom title
4. Profit!

marchron 10-16-2007 02:49 AM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
[ QUOTE ]
How do you get a custom title?

[/ QUOTE ]
Deserve one.

Xylocain 10-16-2007 02:56 AM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
http://imatt.us/mt/archives/orly.JPG

bravos1 10-16-2007 03:38 AM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
[ QUOTE ]
1. Get banned by Wookie
2. ????
3. Get custom title
4. Profit!

[/ QUOTE ]

hmm must be more to it than that... else I'd have one..lol

train. 10-16-2007 09:01 AM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
[ QUOTE ]
anyone use linux with gnome?

I want to change the icon pictures for the login screen for a bunch of users. Is this easy to do as an administrator, without logging in separately as each user?

aim copremesa if you have any ideas

buzz

[/ QUOTE ]

wtf? why did you make a new acct. I saw you sign a post earlier and started to make a comment about us already having one to many buzz's. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

edit: [ QUOTE ]
Loc: procrastinating 7K

[/ QUOTE ]
I guess I see why now, still lame. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

bennyhana 10-16-2007 09:58 AM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
[ QUOTE ]
I guess I see why now, still lame.

[/ QUOTE ]

marchron 10-16-2007 10:00 AM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How do you get a custom title?

[/ QUOTE ]
Deserve one.

[/ QUOTE ]
O RLY?

[/ QUOTE ]
It doesn't have to be for positive merit. If you really want one, you can do something so dumb that it's marked on you like a brand. For example, post some spam links every now and again. Sure, you'll get IP-banned, but you'll have that custom title.


On a slightly different tangent, this need to create alternate nicks so that one's milestone posts are left intact is kinda lame. Just do what I do and don't make them. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

bennyhana 10-16-2007 10:08 AM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
[ QUOTE ]
On a slightly different tangent, this need to create alternate nicks so that one's milestone posts are left intact is kinda lame. Just do what I do and don't make them. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

7k out of the way. We will now return you to your normal buzzcast.


I'm curious. Why make a gimmick account, and give it away?

scpi10 10-16-2007 10:48 AM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How do you get a custom title?

[/ QUOTE ]
Deserve one.

[/ QUOTE ]

It was just a question. I wasn't asking for one.

marchron 10-16-2007 10:51 AM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
It was a little mean for comedic effect (which, admittedly, flopped; guess bozlax still pulls off the Cantankerous Old Bastard persona better [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] ), but the answer's the same whether you're trolling for a custom title or not. In order to get a custom title, you have to do something that merits one.

bravos1 10-16-2007 10:56 AM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How do you get a custom title?

[/ QUOTE ]
Deserve one.

[/ QUOTE ]
O RLY?

[/ QUOTE ]
It doesn't have to be for positive merit. If you really want one, you can do something so dumb that it's marked on you like a brand. For example, post some spam links every now and again. Sure, you'll get IP-banned, but you'll have that custom title.


On a slightly different tangent, this need to create alternate nicks so that one's milestone posts are left intact is kinda lame. Just do what I do and don't make them. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree.. I think my 5K and 7K posts were prolly something like..

<font class="small">Code:</font><hr /><pre>
LOL ROFLCOPTERWTFBBQ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ELEVEN!!!!!!!!! RETARTS!

Holla!
</pre><hr />

B2_eBoogaloo 10-16-2007 01:17 PM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
On a slightly different tangent, this need to create alternate nicks so that one's milestone posts are left intact is kinda lame. Just do what I do and don't make them. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

7k out of the way. We will now return you to your normal buzzcast.


I'm curious. Why make a gimmick account, and give it away?

[/ QUOTE ]

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to make necessary a means of bonding that includes symbolic and meaningful events. These are substantive to communication, and are key pieces of information that definine the group. Such memes in the 2p2 community include modes of communication (e.g. ___aments), titles (e.g. enough is enough), and milestone posts (e.g. 6-max stats). These memes are nearly meaningless outside of such a community. Because #posts = round number, or a quantity which prompts UBB Code to change the stock title is considered meaningful, we call this a milestone. On the way to the rounded number, we may make a random post such as "LOL" or "bet the flop" or perhaps a more meaningful post. Regardless, the milestone is a collective decision of the group that makes the meme what it is. A gimmick account is another meme, but there is not one philosophy of the gimmick. Some gimmicks are obviously anonymous accounts, but not all. Eskimo5ickness has a known gimmick account, and so does DavidC. Perhaps it is a fun variation, and provides an alternative than the day-to-day routine of posting under the legitimate account.

If any poster were to count up all posts on all of their accounts, only those that are meaningful posts, and then considers the next “big round number” post to be a milestone in the account of their choice, then perhaps that is a meaningful milestone. That post will most likely not be a round-number or a UBB Code-determined title. This is obviously pointless. All this amounts to post-count is meaningless. So the irony is that while I requested the self-ban at 6999, I wanted to keep posting, thus the gimmick. I personally would like to make a meaningful post, and I want the number to be #7K. So in the interim, I post using a gimmick. Not a hard decision, and not pointless either.

B2_eBoogaloo 10-16-2007 01:17 PM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
[ QUOTE ]
It was a little mean for comedic effect (which, admittedly, flopped; guess bozlax still pulls off the Cantankerous Old Bastard persona better [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] ), but the answer's the same whether you're trolling for a custom title or not. In order to get a custom title, you have to do something that merits one.

[/ QUOTE ]

Spoken like someone who feels a sense of entitlement.

B2_eBoogaloo 10-16-2007 01:18 PM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
journeyman!

+ post count

BolgreiphNorxx 10-16-2007 01:40 PM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
Boogieman,

I agree but I had nothing to make a milestone post of, so in shame I will now post my n/c spew under my gimmick.

B2_eBoogaloo 10-16-2007 01:53 PM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
The shame is yours alone, for I do not feel shame.

Buzz

marchron 10-16-2007 02:06 PM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It was a little mean for comedic effect (which, admittedly, flopped; guess bozlax still pulls off the Cantankerous Old Bastard persona better [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] ), but the answer's the same whether you're trolling for a custom title or not. In order to get a custom title, you have to do something that merits one.

[/ QUOTE ]

Spoken like someone who feels a sense of entitlement.

[/ QUOTE ]
Not so. Both of my custom titles came on the recommendations of others. While I am proud that my work has inspired them, it's not something I felt entitled to.

tyler_cracker 10-16-2007 02:35 PM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
[ QUOTE ]
Boogieman,

I agree but I had nothing to make a milestone post of, so in shame I will now post my n/c spew under my gimmick.

[/ QUOTE ]

i think this is (in order of likelihood):

1. sushiglutton
2. xylocain
3. smurph64
4. unterfish
...
12. bravos1


edit: i really want it to be xylocain so that this is a 2nd-level gimmick account.

MrWookie 10-16-2007 02:42 PM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
[ QUOTE ]
4. unterfish


[/ QUOTE ]

Excellent work, detective.

tyler_cracker 10-16-2007 03:00 PM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
4. unterfish


[/ QUOTE ]

Excellent work, detective.

[/ QUOTE ]

does this mean i get the promotion, cap'n?

Xylocain 10-16-2007 03:13 PM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 

tyler_cracker 10-16-2007 03:41 PM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
xylo,

i voted 3rd because it is the correct answer. hth.

BolgreiphNorxx 10-16-2007 04:08 PM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
I had no idea this would be such a mystery. All wrong btw. Keep trying. Or don't. w/e

Brain 10-16-2007 04:59 PM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
I need a beer.

OziBattler 10-16-2007 05:30 PM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It was a little mean for comedic effect (which, admittedly, flopped; guess bozlax still pulls off the Cantankerous Old Bastard persona better [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] ), but the answer's the same whether you're trolling for a custom title or not. In order to get a custom title, you have to do something that merits one.

[/ QUOTE ]

Spoken like someone who feels a sense of entitlement.

[/ QUOTE ]

someone might be someone disappointed when we move to vBulletin then.....

bozlax 10-16-2007 05:32 PM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
O noes! vBull takes aways me precious custom tittle? Precious........

bravos1 10-16-2007 05:39 PM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
[ QUOTE ]
O noes! vBull takes aways me precious custom tittle? Precious........

[/ QUOTE ]

but your local mod can reinstate if they so wish

bravos1 10-16-2007 05:42 PM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
On a slightly different tangent, this need to create alternate nicks so that one's milestone posts are left intact is kinda lame. Just do what I do and don't make them. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

7k out of the way. We will now return you to your normal buzzcast.


I'm curious. Why make a gimmick account, and give it away?

[/ QUOTE ]

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to make necessary a means of bonding that includes symbolic and meaningful events. These are substantive to communication, and are key pieces of information that definine the group. Such memes in the 2p2 community include modes of communication (e.g. ___aments), titles (e.g. enough is enough), and milestone posts (e.g. 6-max stats). These memes are nearly meaningless outside of such a community. Because #posts = round number, or a quantity which prompts UBB Code to change the stock title is considered meaningful, we call this a milestone. On the way to the rounded number, we may make a random post such as "LOL" or "bet the flop" or perhaps a more meaningful post. Regardless, the milestone is a collective decision of the group that makes the meme what it is. A gimmick account is another meme, but there is not one philosophy of the gimmick. Some gimmicks are obviously anonymous accounts, but not all. Eskimo5ickness has a known gimmick account, and so does DavidC. Perhaps it is a fun variation, and provides an alternative than the day-to-day routine of posting under the legitimate account.

If any poster were to count up all posts on all of their accounts, only those that are meaningful posts, and then considers the next “big round number” post to be a milestone in the account of their choice, then perhaps that is a meaningful milestone. That post will most likely not be a round-number or a UBB Code-determined title. This is obviously pointless. All this amounts to post-count is meaningless. So the irony is that while I requested the self-ban at 6999, I wanted to keep posting, thus the gimmick. I personally would like to make a meaningful post, and I want the number to be #7K. So in the interim, I post using a gimmick. Not a hard decision, and not pointless either.

[/ QUOTE ]

But why does it matter? Once you put in post 7000+, no one is gonna know what your 7000th post was.

Does it make any diff if it is post 7000 or 7015?

Gimmicks are good for many reasons, hell I have one (no one knows it!), but I don't see the need here.

MrWookie 10-16-2007 05:46 PM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
Correct, and mods won't be able to give it back. Only the reds.

bravos1 10-16-2007 05:49 PM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
[ QUOTE ]
Correct, and mods won't be able to give it back. Only the reds.

[/ QUOTE ]

Really? I'm pretty sure Ryan said mods could as well.

bravos1 10-16-2007 05:58 PM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Correct, and mods won't be able to give it back. Only the reds.

[/ QUOTE ]

Really? I'm pretty sure Ryan said mods could as well.

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah..OK reading comprehension FTW!

from Ryan Beal
[ QUOTE ]
Individual mods can do this if they wish, but they aren't all being logged by the reds or software. Mods also won't directly have that ability in vB. Essentially custom titles will have to go through an admin. This is less by choice than the mod panel being implemented in a different way.

[/ QUOTE ]

KingOtter 10-16-2007 09:33 PM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
I have no custom title... and it's all because of those meddling kids!

KingOtter 10-16-2007 09:37 PM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
On a slightly different tangent, this need to create alternate nicks so that one's milestone posts are left intact is kinda lame. Just do what I do and don't make them. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

7k out of the way. We will now return you to your normal buzzcast.


I'm curious. Why make a gimmick account, and give it away?

[/ QUOTE ]

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to make necessary a means of bonding that includes symbolic and meaningful events. These are substantive to communication, and are key pieces of information that definine the group. Such memes in the 2p2 community include modes of communication (e.g. ___aments), titles (e.g. enough is enough), and milestone posts (e.g. 6-max stats). These memes are nearly meaningless outside of such a community. Because #posts = round number, or a quantity which prompts UBB Code to change the stock title is considered meaningful, we call this a milestone. On the way to the rounded number, we may make a random post such as "LOL" or "bet the flop" or perhaps a more meaningful post. Regardless, the milestone is a collective decision of the group that makes the meme what it is. A gimmick account is another meme, but there is not one philosophy of the gimmick. Some gimmicks are obviously anonymous accounts, but not all. Eskimo5ickness has a known gimmick account, and so does DavidC. Perhaps it is a fun variation, and provides an alternative than the day-to-day routine of posting under the legitimate account.

If any poster were to count up all posts on all of their accounts, only those that are meaningful posts, and then considers the next “big round number” post to be a milestone in the account of their choice, then perhaps that is a meaningful milestone. That post will most likely not be a round-number or a UBB Code-determined title. This is obviously pointless. All this amounts to post-count is meaningless. So the irony is that while I requested the self-ban at 6999, I wanted to keep posting, thus the gimmick. I personally would like to make a meaningful post, and I want the number to be #7K. So in the interim, I post using a gimmick. Not a hard decision, and not pointless either.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol

MrWookie 10-16-2007 10:56 PM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
KO,

Ban.

MrWookie 10-16-2007 10:57 PM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
Or more properly,


1. Get banned by Wookie
2. ????
3. Get custom title
4. ????

Dr. Matt 10-16-2007 11:21 PM

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 
[censored] this absolute stuff is assploding. Wook ban me por favor I gotta go to bed.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.