Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   STT Strategy (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=38)
-   -   1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=554259)

andyquan 11-28-2007 07:16 AM

Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
 
keep the antes and add the 150-300/25 level
oh and lower rake ldo

Daleroxxu 11-28-2007 07:38 AM

Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
 

blackize 11-28-2007 08:07 AM

Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
 
When voting keep in mind that 20 hands per level basically means you're playing 20 minute levels at tight tables.

kimos123 11-28-2007 08:12 AM

Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
 
plz make it like this:
add 150/300 25a - 10/20, 20/30, 25/50, 50/100, 75/150, 100/200, 100/200 25a, 150/300 25a, 200/400 25a, 300/600 50a

Or leave it alone

Daleroxxu 11-28-2007 08:59 AM

Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
 
looking at some recent turbos it seems like 7/8 hands per levels early and about 10/11 hands late, turbos have 5 minute blinds.

auc hincloss 11-28-2007 09:54 AM

Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
 
[ QUOTE ]
plz make it like this:
add 150/300 25a - 10/20, 20/30, 25/50, 50/100, 75/150, 100/200, 100/200 25a, 150/300 25a, 200/400 25a, 300/600 50a

Or leave it alone

[/ QUOTE ]

you want a 20/30 level? thats just stupid. 100/200 25a is a bit pointless as well if you use 150/300 25a...

Luisgallo 11-28-2007 10:03 AM

Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
 
Rake is a huge factor.
Also I would introduce a buy in in between 27 and 60 because 35 really doesn't work, how about 45 (41+4)?

Also get rid of 100/200 and move directly to 100/200/25 and then 150/300/50

Daleroxxu 11-28-2007 10:17 AM

Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
 
[ QUOTE ]
Rake is a huge factor.
Also I would introduce a buy in in between 27 and 60 because 35 really doesn't work, how about 45 (41+4)?

Also get rid of 100/200 and move directly to 100/200/25 and then 150/300/50

[/ QUOTE ]

we hated 32+3 because it had the highest rake of any turbo, the games never ever run more than a few at a time

41+4, are your retarded? (srsly)

saddu 11-28-2007 10:20 AM

Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
 
would be 41+3 luisgallo, 41+4 for a turbo is really bad

Luisgallo 11-28-2007 10:43 AM

Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
 
[ QUOTE ]
would be 41+3 luisgallo, 41+4 for a turbo is really bad

[/ QUOTE ]

correct, I just meant to have a buy in in that range, not really bothered in working out the exact rake.

Unfortunately I am pretty busy unlike Daleroxxu who is fighting a crusade against me...what a loser!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.