Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   MOD DISCUSSION (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=52)
-   -   more bbv retardedness (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=383771)

samjjones 04-24-2007 11:09 AM

Re: more bbv retardedness
 
[ QUOTE ]
so, are all those people just multiple personalities of nos1nos2? i would not be surprised.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes.

diebitter 04-24-2007 11:11 AM

Re: more bbv retardedness
 
I know I am.

Gildwulf 04-24-2007 11:30 AM

Re: more bbv retardedness
 
bizzaro OOT has really gone downhill lately.

diebitter 04-24-2007 11:32 AM

Re: more bbv retardedness
 
[ QUOTE ]
bizzaro OOT has really gone downhill lately.

[/ QUOTE ]


That doesn't matter, the viewing numbers are still fine ldo.

daryn 04-24-2007 11:32 AM

Re: more bbv retardedness
 
anyone want to reply seriously to my post? i guess not?

diebitter 04-24-2007 11:54 AM

Re: more bbv retardedness
 
Daryn

you are nothing in Bizarro OOT

El Diablo 04-24-2007 12:02 PM

Re: more bbv retardedness
 
All,

Some followup to daryn's post.

I checked the forum view stats 5 times yesterday. Each time, OOT had significantly higher viewership than BBV4L.

I posted a screenshot earlier. Here's one from the last time I checked last night and another from a couple of minutes ago:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...xer/dying2.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...xer/dying3.jpg

For comparison, here are the post numbers that Sniper posted:

BBV4L - 1329
SSNL - 1058
BBV - 997
OOT - 990

Like I said, OOT (and BBV) has had far higher viewer than BBV4L every time. That's a much more relevant measure of 2+2 forum success than post count numbers.

In terms of success within 2+2, OOT continues to go super strong. In terms of quality of content there, that is of course subjective.

Are there changes that could make it better? Sure. Should the mods consider things to improve the forum? Sure. Anyone here with specific criticisms or suggestions should make them and OOT mods should take these points under consideration. But just saying crap like "OOT and OOT mods suck, things should be changed!!!" doesn't add any value.

MEbenhoe 04-24-2007 12:10 PM

Re: more bbv retardedness
 
To go off of El D's point, I'm just making an assumption here, but I would think 2+2's advertising revenue is more likely to be based off of page views than posts(unless of course they just charge a flat rate), so even from a business perspective post count #s are likely meaningless.

I do like that this whole thing is being talked through. Good job to all involved.

samjjones 04-24-2007 12:10 PM

Re: more bbv retardedness
 
ED - your thoughts on a "quality past threads" sticky, similar to *TT*'s B&M Sticky?

El Diablo 04-24-2007 12:11 PM

Re: more bbv retardedness
 
db,

Yes, based on the facts above, OOT seems to be just fine. However, if the mods want to get even more feedback than they have already and shake things up a bit by playing around with some changes, I'd be glad to start and be facilitator of an OOT suggestions thread. I'll defer to the OOT mods as to whether or not they think that necessary/productive/positive.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.