Re: Stars Regs Thread
 

I'm still waiting on reasoning as to why I'm not included on this supposed 99% reliable datamine.

Re: Stars Regs Thread
 

some players that i found to be tough without looking at pt or anything:
landerd
lucky_wins
ofishstx, but i think thats cuz i played like [censored] vs him
chillywilly
jager224
boosheit

i think weak tite and suntzureps are over rated, especially suntzureps.

as far as quixoticist or w/e goes, i think i moved up before i got to play him at 6max 1/2 nl, but i played him headsup a lot and he didn't seem good at all, but maybe that's cuz i ran pretty sick hot against him.

Re: Stars Regs Thread
 

its a super secret keep 0evg0 out club

Re: Stars Regs Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
since mid-May at 0.50/1 i think these guys r pretty solid:
(in no order)

Klaskin
bmxreed36
Nataraja21
ffguitarguy
agstremist
ianbarns
nice2beatu
gamblerNCH
sm0kelm
obsid1an
vic3roy
txnoob

[/ QUOTE ]

yay gogogo ego boost [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Re: Stars Regs Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
I'm still waiting on reasoning as to why I'm not included on this supposed 99% reliable datamine.

[/ QUOTE ]

dude, i told you before...100% of hands are not mined. i'd be surprised if even 70% were mined.

if you must know, since 6/1, just less than 20K hands have been tracked for you at 200nl on stars (the filter which I used was for players w/at least 20K hands, so you were not even considered). i'm sure you've played much more than that.

hope this makes you feel better [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Re: Stars Regs Thread
 

i thought you couldn't datamine on stars

Re: Stars Regs Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
i thought you couldn't datamine on stars

[/ QUOTE ]

you can't. fwiw, i have never mined a single hand on poker stars

Re: Stars Regs Thread
 

oh. i thought u were mining these hands urself. where r u getting this data from?

Re: Stars Regs Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
some players that i found to be tough without looking at pt or anything:
landerd
lucky_wins
ofishstx, but i think thats cuz i played like [censored] vs him
chillywilly
jager224
boosheit

i think weak tite and suntzureps are over rated, especially suntzureps.

as far as quixoticist or w/e goes, i think i moved up before i got to play him at 6max 1/2 nl, but i played him headsup a lot and he didn't seem good at all, but maybe that's cuz i ran pretty sick hot against him.

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah i actually played like 2500 hands against him at 2/4, mostly HU but b4 HU tables, one night and raped him severely and thought he was terrible. the more i play with him though the more i think he may actually be really good, or at the very least hard to play against.

Re: Stars Regs Thread
 

do i need more hands to be labled the worst?