Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/12 - 500k Buyin - Part 2 Spoilers aho
 

esfandiari = angle shooting POS nit...can i see one card? what a [censored].

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/12 - 500k Buyin - Part 2 Spoilers aho
 

[ QUOTE ]
esfandiari = angle shooting POS nit...can i see one card? what a [censored].

[/ QUOTE ]

brilliant

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/12 - 500k Buyin - Part 2 Spoilers aho
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
lol at the waitress in the background of the gold/antonius hand..

[/ QUOTE ]
The little "Doyle getting grumpy" comic relief moment at the end was the best though! [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [/qu




I thought the best line was:

Sammy; They let me say raisey daisy in the movie

A.J. What movie are they talking about?

Gabe: 91/2 weeks.




Also anyone know who is Eric Drake is. I goggled him and he's either a young real estate guy or a guy that directed porno movies with Marilyn Chambers.

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/12 - 500k Buyin - Part 2 Spoilers aho
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
So calling 15k to win 365k is a bad play ? Guess some people have never played deep stack NLHE ... If Jamie bets the pot which is 31k or just about close to it I could possibly see folding but betting half the pot is an easy definite call.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol....this is gonna get real dumb real quick. in my 17 years as a pro ive never played deep stack nl. why dont you enlighten me on how he was callling 15 to win an assured 350 and then, after he hit his underwear filling cream dream, he still lost the pot? maybe you need to recheck your maths you badasss deep stack nl pro you...

[/ QUOTE ]

You claim to be a pro for 17 years, yet make a comment like this? Combine that with the fact that you seem like you're ready to squeeze the head off of a pigeon, and I'm starting to worry.

Do you tilt in poker as much as you're tilting in this thread?

[/ QUOTE ]
You save your first post in almost a year and half for this?

[/ QUOTE ]

Are there guidelines for what my first post should have been? Limon is 1) wrong and 2) unnecessarily aggressive.

Sorry they didnt live up to your standards. I've learned a lot from 2p2, though (some of it even pertained to poker), so i'll go back to lurking:(

[/ QUOTE ]

wah.



[/ QUOTE ]

Just explainin why I posted, go back to rabidly defending Gold. Just remember, he'll never love you back.

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL at a 3 post jerkoff trying to insult one of the better posters on this forum.

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/12 - 500k Buyin - Part 2 Spoilers aho
 

[ QUOTE ]
esfandiari = angle shooting POS nit...can i see one card? what a [censored].

[/ QUOTE ]

How is this angle shooting?

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/12 - 500k Buyin - Part 2 Spoilers aho
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
So calling 15k to win 365k is a bad play ? Guess some people have never played deep stack NLHE ... If Jamie bets the pot which is 31k or just about close to it I could possibly see folding but betting half the pot is an easy definite call.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol....this is gonna get real dumb real quick. in my 17 years as a pro ive never played deep stack nl. why dont you enlighten me on how he was callling 15 to win an assured 350 and then, after he hit his underwear filling cream dream, he still lost the pot? maybe you need to recheck your maths you badasss deep stack nl pro you...

[/ QUOTE ]

You claim to be a pro for 17 years, yet make a comment like this? Combine that with the fact that you seem like you're ready to squeeze the head off of a pigeon, and I'm starting to worry.

Do you tilt in poker as much as you're tilting in this thread?

[/ QUOTE ]
You save your first post in almost a year and half for this?

[/ QUOTE ]

Are there guidelines for what my first post should have been? Limon is 1) wrong and 2) unnecessarily aggressive.

Sorry they didnt live up to your standards. I've learned a lot from 2p2, though (some of it even pertained to poker), so i'll go back to lurking:(

[/ QUOTE ]

wah.



[/ QUOTE ]

Just explainin why I posted, go back to rabidly defending Gold. Just remember, he'll never love you back.

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL at a 3 post jerkoff trying to insult one of the better posters on this forum.

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh man, a fellow Colts' fan pullin the 'haha your self worth is determined by your post count' trick. Who talked you off the ledge through your first 5 posts? Or did they just lock you up in a padded room and take off all your strings/laces/sharp objects, etc...

Seriously, how low does your self esteem have to be to try to pull the whole 'haha you have 3 posts' thing?

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/12 - 500k Buyin - Part 2 Spoilers aho
 

No ones mentioned the fact that PA might think he can outplay Jamie. I think it's uncertain how confident PA was that Jamie had a big hand. I think it's an incorrect assumption made a few times in this thread that PA def thought Jamie had a big hand. Makes the analysis much different.

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/12 - 500k Buyin - Part 2 Spoilers aho
 

You limon suck at poker for sure. I mean, cmon. That was sick hand...and it makes me hate jamie gold even more. He is just retard.

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/12 - 500k Buyin - Part 2 Spoilers aho
 

i think anyone who says that PAs flop play is for sure optimal should pretty much never be allowed to argue a/b poker again.

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/12 - 500k Buyin - Part 2 Spoilers aho
 

the flop call is not standard IMO cos he's out of position. However it's not horrible either when ur that deep. u can't say its obv +EV nor that it is a horrendous call. i'm gonna guess patrik actually put gold on a set on the flop TT/QQ NOT KK (nor AA) especially since there's no way PA draws to a 6 outer OOP when only 2 of those outs will get paid. if he thinks gold has TT/QQ then peeling once is ok because although u only got 4 outs you can be pretty sure of a stack off if you hit so this was his reasoning obv.