Re: AP Visit: I\'m going to Costa Rica
 

One thing I forgot: To what extent are they or will they investigate the "dumpees" and their associations with the cheating accounts?

Re: AP Visit: I\'m going to Costa Rica
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
To all you people who are bitching about the money, just SHUT THE [censored] UP!!! We have been asking for a member of the online community to accompany the audit team for greater transparancy-we get what appears to be an offer to go, and you break the guys balls.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hey boss, I'm not sure if you replied to the wrong guy or what, but just to clarify, I don't find it inappropriate at all that Nat get compensated for his time and trouble on this visit.

In fact, it would be outlandish for AP to sincerely invite him and then put the burden on him to foot the bill for expenses and lost opportunity back home.

Totally standard.

However, for Nat's best interest, make sure your lawyer advises you on what position it may put you in the eyes of DOJ by being what some may consider a "paid consultant" that leaves and re-enters the States on "official AP business"......I would certainly hate to see the only guy getting pinched in this whole scenario being the freaking good guy that helped blow the lid off the cover.

[/ QUOTE ]
I will double check that because I will obviously call this off if that is a risk.

Re: AP Visit: I\'m going to Costa Rica
 

this is awesome, and I think you should take Serge, for various reasons. Good luck.

Re: AP Visit: I\'m going to Costa Rica
 

[ QUOTE ]
this is awesome, and I think you should take Serge, for various reasons. Good luck.

[/ QUOTE ]
I'd love to have him come along and I'd happily chop up the fee.

Re: AP Visit: I\'m going to Costa Rica
 

Thank You Nat

Re: AP Visit: I\'m going to Costa Rica
 

[ QUOTE ]
Haven't replyed to any AP threads, but I've read them all with interest.

Nat, I'd definitely like hear your report.

AP should pay back those cheated, NOT Nat. That's just absurd.

[/ QUOTE ]
If it wasn't for Nat it's very possible that the people who was cheated would never be paid back at all.
If nothing else the people who got cheated should pay Nat a commission for the work he's done.
Obviously it's a lot better if AP pay for both.

Re: AP Visit: I\'m going to Costa Rica
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
this is awesome, and I think you should take Serge, for various reasons. Good luck.

[/ QUOTE ]
I'd love to have him come along and I'd happily chop up the fee.

[/ QUOTE ]

tell AP you want to bump it up a bit to include him.

Re: AP Visit: I\'m going to Costa Rica
 

Will you take them a copy of my AP poem and have everyone there autograph it and then send it to me when you get back?

That would be.... Absolutely Awesome! [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

Thanks man. Slacker

Re: AP Visit: I\'m going to Costa Rica
 

I have a feeling you will not come back any wiser from this trip.

Re: AP Visit: I\'m going to Costa Rica
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
To all you people who are bitching about the money, just SHUT THE [censored] UP!!! We have been asking for a member of the online community to accompany the audit team for greater transparancy-we get what appears to be an offer to go, and you break the guys balls.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hey boss, I'm not sure if you replied to the wrong guy or what, but just to clarify, I don't find it inappropriate at all that Nat get compensated for his time and trouble on this visit.

In fact, it would be outlandish for AP to sincerely invite him and then put the burden on him to foot the bill for expenses and lost opportunity back home.

Totally standard.

However, for Nat's best interest, make sure your lawyer advises you on what position it may put you in the eyes of DOJ by being what some may consider a "paid consultant" that leaves and re-enters the States on "official AP business"......I would certainly hate to see the only guy getting pinched in this whole scenario being the freaking good guy that helped blow the lid off the cover.

[/ QUOTE ]
I will double check that because I will obviously call this off if that is a risk.

[/ QUOTE ]


Nat, I would absolutely check on this, re-check, and then check it again. Look at all 'consultants' that have been grabbed by the DOJ for a mere layover in the states, and prosecuted.