Re: Kidpoker > Stinger
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] more details on the cts thm please [/ QUOTE ] Well I can't win if I fold.... [/ QUOTE ] i'm pretty sure the cts theorem is that no one ever has anything on a four flush board |
Re: Kidpoker > Stinger
[ QUOTE ]
lol i don't see the $100/$200 stars guys winning in Vegas for years. maybe they do have an edge in NLHE. but remember... most of these HSNL guys couldn't beat $1/$2 Omaha and don't know any other games. they're not true poker players. DN is good at all games and a better poker player than anyone on the internet. [/ QUOTE ] lol |
Re: Kidpoker > Stinger
This thread is terrbile. Also, Daniel's call was ass.
Barry |
Re: Kidpoker > Stinger
Well said, HV. Excellent post.
|
Re: Kidpoker > Stinger
LOL at DN thinking Stinger only value bets river with "Q high flush".
|
Re: Kidpoker > Stinger
[ QUOTE ]
lol i don't see the $100/$200 stars guys winning in Vegas for years. maybe they do have an edge in NLHE. but remember... most of these HSNL guys couldn't beat $1/$2 Omaha and don't know any other games. they're not true poker players. DN is good at all games and a better poker player than anyone on the internet. [/ QUOTE ] Donkey-Miller, I can't figure out if you are a troll or if you are really just that awful at poker. Every single post I've seen you make recently has made me laugh out loud |
Re: Kidpoker > Stinger
[ QUOTE ]
lol i don't see the $100/$200 stars guys winning in Vegas for years. maybe they do have an edge in NLHE. but remember... most of these HSNL guys couldn't beat $1/$2 Omaha and don't know any other games. they're not true poker players. DN is good at all games and a better poker player than anyone on the internet. [/ QUOTE ] If you mean PLO then lol, but I'm fairly confident I could beat 1/2 O8 even with very limited experience. |
Re: Kidpoker > Stinger
PokerStars Game #12056058227: Tournament #61178034, $2000+$50 Hold'em No Limit - Match Round I, Level I (10/20) - 2007/09/14 - 15:48:00 (ET)
Table '61178034 1' 2-max Seat #2 is the button Seat 1: OnTheRize (690 in chips) Seat 2: AK87 (2310 in chips) AK87: posts small blind 10 OnTheRize: posts big blind 20 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to AK87 [8s Jh] AK87: raises 40 to 60 OnTheRize: calls 40 *** FLOP *** [Ts As 5h] OnTheRize: checks AK87: bets 80 OnTheRize: calls 80 *** TURN *** [Ts As 5h] [2s] OnTheRize: checks AK87: bets 140 OnTheRize: calls 140 *** RIVER *** [Ts As 5h 2s] [6s] OnTheRize: checks AK87: bets 1820 OnTheRize: calls 410 and is all-in *** SHOW DOWN *** AK87: shows [8s Jh] (a flush, Ace high) OnTheRize: shows [Jd Tc] (a pair of Tens) AK87 collected 1380 from pot *** SUMMARY *** Total pot 1380 | Rake 0 Board [Ts As 5h 2s 6s] Seat 1: OnTheRize (big blind) showed [Jd Tc] and lost with a pair of Tens Seat 2: AK87 (button) (small blind) showed [8s Jh] and won (1380) with a flush, Ace high AK87 = Stinger 88 OnTheRize = KidPoker |
Re: Kidpoker > Stinger
[ QUOTE ]
i'm pretty sure the cts theorem is that no one ever has anything on a four flush board [/ QUOTE ] i'm pretty sure the cts theorem has cost me mid 5 figures since i began applying it. |
Re: Kidpoker > Stinger
[ QUOTE ]
*** RIVER *** [8s 5h As Ks] [6s] $tinger 88: bets $10200 KidPoker said, "lol no way" KidPoker said, "I just dont buy it" KidPoker said, "you ALWAYS have a Q hi flush?" KidPoker: calls $10200 I was watching the game a couple a days ago where stinger made a similar bet on the river $10400 (if i rember correctly) on a similar board. DN was thinking about that bet for quite long and folded. Anyone has a HH for that hand? [/ QUOTE ] IIRC the board paired on the river and DN said "I think you 2 outered me". |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:12 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.