Re: Giga the hustler???
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
He was a cash game fish, and a habitual prop bettor, but i'm not sure he was a loser in tournaments and stts.

[/ QUOTE ]

If he cheated in the STT's would that change your mind?

Tuco.

[/ QUOTE ]

Probably, but its hard to knock his live record.

Re: Giga the hustler???
 

[ QUOTE ]
I don't know of anyone who's ever played a lot of SNGs at a high level who thinks multi-accounting in the same SNG would even be worth it. Anyone on earth who thinks the lost equity/risk would ever be worth the slight edge gained by colluding with yourself in a SNG - please chime in here.

[/ QUOTE ]I think it would definitely be worth it and it'd be a huge advantage, especially if you were sat next to yourself(and on the old Party ones you could pick your seat). Around the bubble time having one account being a big stack and protecting and dumping to your other small stack account would be a huge unfair advantage.

Re: Giga the hustler???
 

[ QUOTE ]
everyone who had no clue about sats

[/ QUOTE ]sats?

Re: Giga the hustler???
 

The two table steps were sats, yeah. If he was talking about the 2 table step 5's, multiaccounting with that payout structure would be incredibly dumb.