Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Televised Poker (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=39)
-   -   High Stakes Poker thread (10/1) (Spoilers?) (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=513460)

10-02-2007 06:19 PM

Post deleted by Mat Sklansky
 

WayAbvPar 10-02-2007 06:20 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/1) (Spoilers?)
 
[ QUOTE ]
why are all of you guys such pussy's? who gives a fu(k if she's gonna cry? It's poker and may the best MAN win!!

[censored]'S!!!

[/ QUOTE ]

Feel free to throw yourself into traffic at your earliest convenience.

homeboy604 10-02-2007 07:00 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/1) (Spoilers?)
 
daniel's push vs jen was terrible.

HugoM 10-02-2007 07:11 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/1) (Spoilers?)
 
[ QUOTE ]


How stupid can that Daniel Negreanu be? "Heyyyy Jamie Gold, I can totally tell when you are bluffing! Don't try to bluff me, cause I have a perfect read on you!"

Surprisingly he did not explain to Gold what the tells are.

[/ QUOTE ]

didn't jen say she'd tell jamie after the taping? i mean, what's that about? both her and daniel know when the guy is bluffing and they want to wise him up as to what his tells are? whatever happened to never giving a sucker an even break?

phydaux 10-02-2007 07:16 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/1) (Spoilers?)
 
I think you mean Todd, and he's just pissed at himself for losing her.

His fat ass will never have a quality piece of tail like Jennifer again. Even Kathy Leiber would tell Todd to shove off.

phydaux 10-02-2007 07:18 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/1) (Spoilers?)
 
[ QUOTE ]
why are all of you guys such pussy's? who gives a fu(k if she's gonna cry? It's poker and may the best MAN win!!

QUEER'S!!!

[/ QUOTE ]

Spoken like a true internet perma-virgin.

ChrisV 10-02-2007 08:30 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/1) (Spoilers?)
 
You guys are nuts if you think TT or even 77 is in Jen's limping range in that spot. There were two straddles and a limper, she's not going to let all that dead money into the pot no matter how nitty you think she's playing (and her major problem is that she hasn't had any hands). KTo I can buy, but you should probably include a few KJ hands as well as by the time Daniel bets the flop the pot is a third of her stack and it would be completely reasonable to attack him with KJ, particularly as you nits want him to fold KQ and its virtually impossible for him to have a better hand than that. The idea that she wouldn't attack him with the nut flush draw when the pot is a third of her stack is laughable.

Whitewash 10-02-2007 08:38 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/1) (Spoilers?)
 
[ QUOTE ]
You guys are nuts if you think TT or even 77 is in Jen's limping range in that spot. There were two straddles and a limper, she's not going to let all that dead money into the pot no matter how nitty you think she's playing (and her major problem is that she hasn't had any hands). KTo I can buy, but you should probably include a few KJ hands as well as by the time Daniel bets the flop the pot is a third of her stack and it would be completely reasonable to attack him with KJ, particularly as you nits want him to fold KQ and its virtually impossible for him to have a better hand than that. The idea that she wouldn't attack him with the nut flush draw when the pot is a third of her stack is laughable.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol, watching Jen's holecards for 4 seasons has given me the impression she is definitely willing to limp 77 in this spot.

Dominic 10-02-2007 10:00 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/1) (Spoilers?)
 
[ QUOTE ]
I think you mean Todd, and he's just pissed at himself for losing her.

His fat ass will never have a quality piece of tail like Jennifer again. Even Kathy Leiber would tell Todd to shove off.

[/ QUOTE ]

I take it you've never seen Todd Brunson's wife.

im a model 10-03-2007 01:11 AM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/1) (Spoilers?)
 
for people who like to act like they know what theyre talking about, a lot of you guys seldom know what youre talking about:

[ QUOTE ]
There was like 9k or something in the pot when it got to Jenn

[/ QUOTE ]

not even close. it was 2400 to go plus the 100 ante. five players called (i think maybe one folded), so thats $12,500. daniel bets $8,000. so its $20,500. man im good at math.

and (different poster)

[ QUOTE ]
And it's 67k for him to call

[/ QUOTE ]

you have to subtract daniels bet of $8,000. he doesnt have to call $8,000 again. so when daniel goes all in (he didnt call), it was a total of about $59,000 more. so it was about $59,000 to win $88,000, or about 2:3. again, i am phenomenal at math. so if she has what he thinks she has, its the right move. turned out he was more like 3:7, so it wasnt good, but not terrible.

plus he might have been feeling lucky (which is not to be understated).


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.