Re: Longshot Theoretical Question: Paul v Hillary
 

And it was completely douchey. You basically compared Dr. Paul's plan to give young people more choice in their retirement while not throwing the dependent out on the street by stopping wars of foreign aggression and empire with the mass murder.

Totally douchey, Douchey McDoucherson.

Re: Longshot Theoretical Question: Paul v Hillary
 

[ QUOTE ]
What's douchey about it? Paul wants to end social security and government support for the elderly.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry, but this is completely incorrect. He wants to give people the ability to opt out and nothing more. He has no intention of removing funding from or even eliminating Social Security and when asked about it in interviews he talks about how SS is going bankrupt and that his solution for this is that fixing our foreign policy and money supply will give us the money we need to be able to pay for SS. He has zero intention of "ending" SS.

Re: Longshot Theoretical Question: Paul v Hillary
 

Didn't Paul try and get a bill through that would have preserved the Social Security Funds from being spent on other things?