12 Tabling Experiment: 1000 sample of each buy-in

[Winky McGee]

I am doing an experiment. I am going to 12-table until I play 1000 tournaments at every level on PartyPoker (yes I am aware that 1000 is not divisible by 12). I will do this until I show a negative ROI (or when I go broke, whatever happens first). I never tried 12-tabling until this experiment, but I find it to be a lot easier than I thought. Sometimes I think I play better in ways because I don't over-think. The only downside is when I have to go the bathroom. I normally have to miss like 4 hands. An empty gatorade bottle has solved this problem nicely (just kidding [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]).

I already played 1054 at the 10+1 level (keep in mind that my first 300 or so are from when I was a sit and go beginner and knew absolutely jack squat about poker).

Here are my stats:
10+1:
ROI: 18.41%
ROI over the last 916 (more indicative of my new non-beginner skillz that pay the billz as this is after I learned pushbot stuff etc): 23.16%

I overall expect that I should have a 23% roi or higher which means that one can make about $33 an hour playing 10+1s. But obviously a person is probably better off killing himself than being a professional 10+1 player.

I'm not going to break down into the details of my stats too much but I pretty much own the 10+1s 12 tabling I am a God among the scumbags (just kidding again!). But here is what I ask of the readers and I'm being serious now.

Assuming that I don't improve as a player for the rest of the experiment, and all you know is that I'm a 23% roi 10+1 player, what will you predict my results are 12-tabling the final buy-ins based on my ROI in the 10+1s? I will post my results as they happen.

20+2: ??
30+2: ??
50+5: ??
100+9: ??

I would appreciate any thoughtful response to this post.