|
|
#981
10-11-2007, 08:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Regs Thread
yeah that br thing is so pointless
party gave me a £5 bonus today. A restricted bonus at that, are they taking the piss? |
|
#982
10-11-2007, 08:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Regs Thread
[ QUOTE ]
lol I'm pretty sure the bankroll thing isn't going to affect 100NL+. Isn't it like $50 if you play all 14 days? [/ QUOTE ] Yeah that's what I would have thought. Probably just coincidence that the tables sucked tonight. |
|
#984
10-11-2007, 08:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Regs Thread
was awesome at 600nl for a bit today, there was a table with 4 deepish idiots and 1 nit, the nit was on my left too. i nearly came. then the fish left and tags swarmed in. always the way, sigh.
|
|
#986
10-11-2007, 09:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Regs Thread
[ QUOTE ]
nl200 tables are as fishy as always [/ QUOTE ] No they aren't. They are still fishy. But not as much as they used to be... Before you could sit down at every table and there was minimum one fish. But now you have to table select. Ugh... |
|
#988
10-12-2007, 12:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Regs Thread
[ QUOTE ]
How many hands do I have to play to get 1200 points at NL100? Rough estimate it fine, ty. [/ QUOTE ] About 3500 hands I think. I think that Stars has a better compensation structure for high volume players unless you have party rb. |
|
#989
10-12-2007, 01:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Regs Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] How many hands do I have to play to get 1200 points at NL100? Rough estimate it fine, ty. [/ QUOTE ] About 3500 hands I think. I think that Stars has a better compensation structure for high volume players unless you have party rb. [/ QUOTE ] impossible there is no rb at party now |
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
