Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Who are the Top 5 SNG players in the World? Have to of played 1k 215s+ to Answer )
1. Good2cu (ShipItHolla, OkemosGod) 5 4.27%
2. Z23fanatic (rosekto/herpes4l1fe) 15 12.82%
3. Bigjoe (bigjoe, newt_buggins) 12 10.26%
4. Newt (Idiotluxbox) 13 11.11%
5. Majorpolk (MyPlayground2) 1 0.85%
6. Deuce2High (pwnasaurusx, hezaquick1) 5 4.27%
7. Curtains 9 7.69%
8. JohnnyBax 2 1.71%
9. Sheets 0 0%
10. GregRaymer(Fossilman) 2 1.71%
11. BonafoneX(Billy4inc, Pwhap) 6 5.13%
12. Raptor517 (Raptor517, PinkRazor etc.) 8 6.84%
13. Gramps (Burrito4me) 7 5.98%
14. Scrubs 0 0%
15. The_Dry 4 3.42%
16. FireyJustice (JCardShark, Gormos, XxtabiasXX) 5 4.27%
17. Zeejustin (50+ Screen names) 3 2.56%
18. Gigabet (40% ROI!! LOL) 4 3.42%
19. Daniel Alei 2 1.71%
20. Jman28 (Sassypants) 1 0.85%
21. Shannon Shorr (Bluff4Rent) 2 1.71%
22. Noodleman 3 2.56%
23. Phil Ivey 0 0%
Other 5 4.27%
Other 3 2.56%
Voters: 117. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #941  
Old 08-28-2007, 04:02 PM
A S U A S U is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: What a beast
Posts: 1,765
Default Re: Official \"it\'s not too early to start talking about Fantasy Footba

[ QUOTE ]
ASU - wtf? Why was Chris Henry selected? Is this a 14-team league or something?

[/ QUOTE ]

Haha cause my $$ league is full of noooobs. I'm the commish this year and I always do a little post-draft write-up. I've narrowed it down to these 3 teams, but damn they all suck so hard I can't figure it out! 12 team BTW. Team 1 had pick 2, team had pick 12 and team 3 had pick 3.
Reply With Quote
  #942  
Old 08-28-2007, 04:07 PM
bluef0x bluef0x is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 2,295
Default Re: Official \"it\'s not too early to start talking about Fantasy Footba

I need to find some $$$ leagues like that [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] Does anyone know of sites you can just join and play? CBS/ESPN/Yahoo's pay sites are so frikin retarded. They take out either 100% or 90% of the entry fees.

I have a live draft next week with my dad's buddies. It's TDs frikin' ONLY. They've been playing for over 20 years so they've never had yardage. No one wanted to sit down with the newspaper for hours calculating everything. I usually play in their playoff pool and win, but this will be my first time playing for the season. I'm trying to get them to add yardage. They always select kickers in the 5th or 6th round because they have a scoring scheme that makes 'em look attractive. Yet, they don't realize that the difference between kickers is so small.
Reply With Quote
  #943  
Old 08-28-2007, 04:18 PM
hoyasnaxa hoyasnaxa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NoVA
Posts: 2,054
Default Re: Official \"it\'s not too early to start talking about Fantasy Footba

[ QUOTE ]
Projected value of #2 QB - #15 QB = 50pts. Projected value of #2 RB - #15 RB = 110 pts.

[/ QUOTE ]

I understand that, but he isnt going to get the #2 RB, or evern probly the #6 or 7 RB. The gap between the 8-15 RB is going to be a lot smaller, and he would also have the #1 QB.
Reply With Quote
  #944  
Old 08-28-2007, 04:25 PM
chaseUdown chaseUdown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 520
Default Re: Official \"it\'s not too early to start talking about Fantasy Footba

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
ASU - wtf? Why was Chris Henry selected? Is this a 14-team league or something?

[/ QUOTE ]

Haha cause my $$ league is full of noooobs. I'm the commish this year and I always do a little post-draft write-up. I've narrowed it down to these 3 teams, but damn they all suck so hard I can't figure it out! 12 team BTW. Team 1 had pick 2, team had pick 12 and team 3 had pick 3.

[/ QUOTE ]

What does your post-draft write-up usually consist of? I'm considering doing one for my league but I can't figure out what to put it in.
Reply With Quote
  #945  
Old 08-28-2007, 04:26 PM
bluef0x bluef0x is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 2,295
Default Re: Official \"it\'s not too early to start talking about Fantasy Footba

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Projected value of #2 QB - #15 QB = 50pts. Projected value of #2 RB - #15 RB = 110 pts.

[/ QUOTE ]

I understand that, but he isnt going to get the #2 RB, or evern probly the #6 or 7 RB. The gap between the 8-15 RB is going to be a lot smaller, and he would also have the #1 QB.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't mind taking Manning, as I said earlier. I'm explaining why you can wait on QBs and can't on RBs. Also, you are forgetting one important thing.... RBs are taken faster than QBs. You can get the #15 QB in the 7th or 8th round. You can't get the #15 RB in the 7th or 8th round.
Reply With Quote
  #946  
Old 08-28-2007, 04:30 PM
A S U A S U is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: What a beast
Posts: 1,765
Default Re: Official \"it\'s not too early to start talking about Fantasy Footba

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
ASU - wtf? Why was Chris Henry selected? Is this a 14-team league or something?

[/ QUOTE ]

Haha cause my $$ league is full of noooobs. I'm the commish this year and I always do a little post-draft write-up. I've narrowed it down to these 3 teams, but damn they all suck so hard I can't figure it out! 12 team BTW. Team 1 had pick 2, team had pick 12 and team 3 had pick 3.

[/ QUOTE ]

What does your post-draft write-up usually consist of? I'm considering doing one for my league but I can't figure out what to put it in.

[/ QUOTE ]

They are pretty brief. About 3-4 sentences for each team. I will typically rank them 1-12 and give their strengths, weaknesses and season outlook. That usually consists of my prediction based on their division and keys to victory. Stuff like that. I sorta feel bad this year, becuase one of the potential bottom teams is one I listed above. I have ranked him dead last the past 2 years. This could be the third. I think he's under the impression I have it out for him. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #947  
Old 08-28-2007, 04:30 PM
lennytheduck lennytheduck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: med school
Posts: 685
Default Re: Official \"it\'s not too early to start talking about Fantasy Footba

[ QUOTE ]
bluef0x,

In Draft dominator using 2 QB's Manning is number 3, Palmer is number 7, Brady is number 14.

So, Tyler, I would really consider Palmer and Brady as your first two picks if both are available.

[/ QUOTE ]

Have another cup of whatever Kool-Aid you're drinking and do us all a favor.
Reply With Quote
  #948  
Old 08-28-2007, 04:32 PM
bluef0x bluef0x is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 2,295
Default Re: Official \"it\'s not too early to start talking about Fantasy Footba

No one gets pissed off?

Also, writing a keys to victory = against common sense, unless you are planting seeds to screw up their team and get good deals going.
Reply With Quote
  #949  
Old 08-28-2007, 04:38 PM
Clarkmeister Clarkmeister is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: THATSATOOMANY!!!!
Posts: 17,935
Default Re: Official \"it\'s not too early to start talking about Fantasy Footba

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
you picked L. Coles over R. Brown and S. Moss?? ouch.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd take Coles over Brown. McNabb spreads the ball around a ton; he won't get thrown to enough. Coles was thrown the ball 151 times last year, while Brown only got 91 passes. That's a 66% difference. In a PPR league this is a no brainer.

[/ QUOTE ]

Games with McNabb and no Stallworth:

5 for 106
4 for 79, 1 TD
6 for 121, 1 TD
4 for 77, 1 TD

You would be a fool to pass on Brown for Coles. Brown was upgraded from number 2 WR to number 1 WR in a pass first offense. Stallworth had great numbers as the #1. If you combine their numbers for the year you get a legit top 12 WR. Hate the pick.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed that Brown has a higher ceiling. But with this scoring system (1ppr, 1pt/10yds, 6/td), and the fact that we had zero WRs at that point, Coles was the lower variance choice, which is what we needed at the time. It's pretty unlikely that it's a choice which will make or break us.
Reply With Quote
  #950  
Old 08-28-2007, 04:39 PM
bluef0x bluef0x is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 2,295
Default Re: Official \"it\'s not too early to start talking about Fantasy Footba

Was it just you and a friend Clarkmeister or did you have a team of 3+ splitting the fee?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.