![]() |
|
#81
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] chicks love tall guys [/ QUOTE ] confidence is more important than height [/ QUOTE ] If a guy is confident-height is a non-issue. |
|
#82
|
|||
|
|||
|
Take a look at passion.com, match.com, etc and tell me how many women's ads say they are seeking a guy no taller than 5'7"?
Exactly. |
|
#83
|
|||
|
|||
|
yup. plenty of those types of snobs out there.
but then many will change their mind if you're clever/confident enough. So really it's only that (for some of them) they only THINK they will only go for someone that tall. |
|
#84
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] being 5'5" would really suck. [/ QUOTE ] I have 2 friends who are about 5'5" and they got more tail then they could handle in college and I never once remember their height being an issue for them. [/ QUOTE ] I don't think my height was that much of an issue for me either. but dating some 5-9 girl AND she's wearing heels when we go out did make me feel a bit awkward I guess. Not a big deal though. Remember one slightly taller girl: We kind of mutually blew each other off after a couple of weeks. Few weeks later I see her walking down the street with a dude even shorter than me (probably 5-2 or 5-3 or so). I think she had some weird 'shorter than her' fetish or something. I maintain that being ugly or obese would suck WAY worse than being 5-5. And I'm actually part-way towards both. I'm not exactly Clark Gable in the looks dept...and I have probably 15-20 pounds more than I need. |
|
#85
|
|||
|
|||
|
You can lose weight though and change your looks somewhat. But you can't really change penis size or height.
|
|
#86
|
|||
|
|||
|
This thread kind of opened my eyes on how whack people be. 5'5" with an 8" wang (the proportional girth here is the key) is so incredibly the obvious choice for me. It's not like being that short is going to ruin your life. Plus you would be dicking so many hot yatches cuz they told their friends about your huge wang that life would be tight. 6'1" is nothing special. I'm 6'1" and nobody cares. But 8" is very special. And 4" is DEVASTATINGLY SMALL. The girth, which is what girls care about, on a 4 inch wang is a touch over 3" on average. My middle finger is 3" in girth. If your wang is as skinny as your finger you are in trouble and any reasonable girl who cares about her sex life is going to dump you or cheat on you. And lastly, how the [censored] are you 5'6, with 18' arms, and you can only bench 230? I'm pretty strong, (and I'm sexy and I have a moustache) and my arms unflexed are 13 inches (14.75 flexed) and I can bench 275 and I could get about 25 reps curling 50s. This thread for some reason has brought out some anger in me.
|
|
#87
|
|||
|
|||
|
good points man
|
|
#88
|
|||
|
|||
|
yea the other issue is that 4" is really small. being 5'5" in height is not as bad as be 4" in your pants imo.
|
|
#89
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
yea the other issue is that 4" is really small. being 5'5" in height is not as bad as be 4" in your pants imo. [/ QUOTE ] according to the stats i linked earlier, about 1 in 200 men have 4" or less, and a slight larger fraction have 8" or more. so the cock sizes are more extreme than the heights. |
|
#90
|
|||
|
|||
|
The MR average link is good but I have an issue with it:
From my own experience, there are degrees of erection. When I am at my most erect I am bigger than when I am just slightly erect. So at what point are these studies measuring it? Obviously someone would be longer when they are just about to go, compared to someone who had just gotten hard. |
![]() |
|
|