LT AP's MVP

[dknightx]

NO would be super bowl favorites by a large margin with manning

[capone0]

Probally more to do with the fact that they are in the NFC. Just look at how NO has faired against the AFC this year, it isn't pretty.

[Jack of Arcades]

To be fair, a lot of fluky things went wrong in thsoe games.

[Thremp]

[ QUOTE ]
Bears would be super bowl favorites by a large margin with manning

[/ QUOTE ]

[capone0]

Such as?

They were down 35-7 to the Ravens at home.

Against the Steelers they did give up some rediculously long runs.

In the Cincy game, they were down 31-0, but it pwas probally due to a couple of luck things. Still they didn't fare too well against the AFC North at all.

[onlinebeginner]

[ QUOTE ]
To be fair, a lot of fluky things went wrong in thsoe games.

[/ QUOTE ]
i saw them play the ravens live... they got RIZZZZOCKED

[onlinebeginner]

ya charliedontsurf use a stupid head yo

[TheRover]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Bears would be undefeated with manning

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

[Case Closed]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It was broken TWICE in the last 3 years. Yet it won't happen in 15 years. Give me a break. It'll probally be broken again soon enough, maybe a couple of times. You act like this is the home run record or something that hasn't been broken or approached often. LT has had 31 tds, 20 tds and 18 the last 3. SA before this year had 28, 20, 16, 18 (total TDs), Holmes had 24 27 in 2 consecutive years.

Faulk had 26, 21 in 2 consecutive years. This record can be broken.

[/ QUOTE ]
Scoring doesn't really change much over the years, so there has to be a peak with these types of records. I think we've reached it.

[/ QUOTE ]


As with other arguments, you lack reason and logic to back up your claims.

[Jack of Arcades]

[ QUOTE ]
Such as?

They were down 35-7 to the Ravens at home.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, they played like crap but there were a couple of tip drill pick sixes that game.

[ QUOTE ]
Against the Steelers they did give up some rediculously long runs.

[/ QUOTE ]

Fumbled like 4 times and lost 3 of them, one of them deep to tie the game

[ QUOTE ]
In the Cincy game, they were down 31-0, but it pwas probally due to a couple of luck things.

[/ QUOTE ]

31-10, you mean? A pick six and a couple of red zone ints. I mean, I'm not saying it's all luck.

But they played the Steelers close and Bengals close until the 4th Q. Yeah, Ravens game sucked, I turned it off after a half, haha.

Still, I think it'd be wrong to look at that and just say that it's because they're in the NFC. They beat 3 playoff teams, and 2 of them were good at the time! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]