Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Puzzles and Other Games
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: WWOOTD?
Don't eat the steaks, return the groceries immediately and if they could not be returned offer to pay for them 6 6.82%
Eat the steaks, go back and pay for them tomorrow 16 18.18%
FREE STEAK! Fuggedabout paying, it's only $6. 63 71.59%
I am a vegetarian and this poll is against my beliefs 3 3.41%
Voters: 88. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 10-24-2006, 01:37 PM
nuggetz87 nuggetz87 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: labtop
Posts: 6,175
Default Re: Miss POG Round 2-1-5 (NSFW)

who cares neither of these is gonna win the contest anyways.
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 10-24-2006, 01:42 PM
NajdorfDefense NajdorfDefense is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 8,227
Default Re: Miss POG Round 2-1-5 (NSFW)

[ QUOTE ]
again you would have to be lame to vote with gimmick accts. Because Keira was winning you are assuming at least 10 of her votes were from gimmick accts?? Ridiculous

[/ QUOTE ]

Uh, no, I didn't vote with gimmick accounts, I'm pointing out that that accusation can fly both ways. To say it applies to only one candidate, if it is happening is absurd.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 10-24-2006, 01:44 PM
sightless sightless is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 9,009
Default Re: Miss POG Round 2-1-5 (NSFW)






















Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 10-24-2006, 01:47 PM
NajdorfDefense NajdorfDefense is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 8,227
Default Re: Miss POG Round 2-1-5 (NSFW)

There are currently 13 less votes in this thread than the Portman thread and about the same as the prior voting thread, fwiw. Doesn't seem to indicate vote-rigging so far.

I would also guess more people would vote in a close race. And, not surprisingly, the more photos of ABB that were posted, the more certain posters got interested in voting for her, as some of them said outright.
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 10-24-2006, 01:48 PM
sightless sightless is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 9,009
Default Re: Miss POG Round 2-1-5 (NSFW)


edit: one last comment in this thread
[ QUOTE ]
There are currently 13 less votes in this thread than the Portman thread and about the same as the prior voting thread, fwiw. Doesn't seem to indicate vote-rigging so far.


[/ QUOTE ]

DId you see the voets fly up by 10 for whats her name in the span of 2 minutes?....


meh [censored] this, [censored] you all
















Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 10-24-2006, 01:49 PM
metsandfinsfan metsandfinsfan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Long Island
Posts: 22,346
Default Re: Miss POG Round 2-1-5 (NSFW)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
again you would have to be lame to vote with gimmick accts. Because Keira was winning you are assuming at least 10 of her votes were from gimmick accts?? Ridiculous

[/ QUOTE ]

Uh, no, I didn't vote with gimmick accounts, I'm pointing out that that accusation can fly both ways. To say it applies to only one candidate, if it is happening is absurd.

[/ QUOTE ]

the point was this. It was a 1 pt vote. Durron announces he is extending it a bit. 10 minutes later, one of the candidate mysteriously receives 10 votes in 3 minutes with no new posters posting in the thread

I agree that neither of these two candidates are likely to make it past next round, so whatever durron just end it already
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 10-24-2006, 02:01 PM
NajdorfDefense NajdorfDefense is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 8,227
Default Re: Miss POG Round 2-1-5 (NSFW)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
again you would have to be lame to vote with gimmick accts. Because Keira was winning you are assuming at least 10 of her votes were from gimmick accts?? Ridiculous

[/ QUOTE ]

Uh, no, I didn't vote with gimmick accounts, I'm pointing out that that accusation can fly both ways. To say it applies to only one candidate, if it is happening is absurd.

[/ QUOTE ]

the point was this. It was a 1 pt vote. Durron announces he is extending it a bit. ...already

[/ QUOTE ]

Without the same level of 'analysis' applied to the other candidate, this is meaningless.
However, if anyone registered 10 gimmick acc'ts, pls out yourself to be fair.
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 10-24-2006, 02:04 PM
metsandfinsfan metsandfinsfan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Long Island
Posts: 22,346
Default Re: Miss POG Round 2-1-5 (NSFW)

it's 2PM let's move on
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 10-24-2006, 02:13 PM
durron597 durron597 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Folding
Posts: 30,000
Default Re: Miss POG Round 2-1-5 (NSFW)

[ QUOTE ]

However, if anyone registered 10 gimmick acc'ts, pls out yourself to be fair.

[/ QUOTE ]

i consulted with someone impartial. they point out that if there were 10 gimmick accounts (because it went 57-53 to like 58-63), then ana beatriz barros is still legitimately up by 4 votes, right?

unless that person made even more gimmick accounts AFTER they put ana in a substantial lead
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 10-24-2006, 02:22 PM
dmk dmk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Twilight
Posts: 14,348
Default Re: Miss POG Round 2-1-5 (NSFW)

durron,

there are 11 registered users looking at this forum right now. how do you suppose there were 15-20 some votes in the past couple of hours (when you know the regulars had already voted by then)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.