![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: WWOOTD? | |||
| Don't eat the steaks, return the groceries immediately and if they could not be returned offer to pay for them |
|
6 | 6.82% |
| Eat the steaks, go back and pay for them tomorrow |
|
16 | 18.18% |
| FREE STEAK! Fuggedabout paying, it's only $6. |
|
63 | 71.59% |
| I am a vegetarian and this poll is against my beliefs |
|
3 | 3.41% |
| Voters: 88. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#81
|
|||
|
|||
|
who cares neither of these is gonna win the contest anyways.
|
|
#82
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
again you would have to be lame to vote with gimmick accts. Because Keira was winning you are assuming at least 10 of her votes were from gimmick accts?? Ridiculous [/ QUOTE ] Uh, no, I didn't vote with gimmick accounts, I'm pointing out that that accusation can fly both ways. To say it applies to only one candidate, if it is happening is absurd. |
|
#83
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
#84
|
|||
|
|||
|
There are currently 13 less votes in this thread than the Portman thread and about the same as the prior voting thread, fwiw. Doesn't seem to indicate vote-rigging so far.
I would also guess more people would vote in a close race. And, not surprisingly, the more photos of ABB that were posted, the more certain posters got interested in voting for her, as some of them said outright. |
|
#85
|
|||
|
|||
|
edit: one last comment in this thread [ QUOTE ] There are currently 13 less votes in this thread than the Portman thread and about the same as the prior voting thread, fwiw. Doesn't seem to indicate vote-rigging so far. [/ QUOTE ] DId you see the voets fly up by 10 for whats her name in the span of 2 minutes?.... meh [censored] this, [censored] you all
|
|
#86
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] again you would have to be lame to vote with gimmick accts. Because Keira was winning you are assuming at least 10 of her votes were from gimmick accts?? Ridiculous [/ QUOTE ] Uh, no, I didn't vote with gimmick accounts, I'm pointing out that that accusation can fly both ways. To say it applies to only one candidate, if it is happening is absurd. [/ QUOTE ] the point was this. It was a 1 pt vote. Durron announces he is extending it a bit. 10 minutes later, one of the candidate mysteriously receives 10 votes in 3 minutes with no new posters posting in the thread I agree that neither of these two candidates are likely to make it past next round, so whatever durron just end it already |
|
#87
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] again you would have to be lame to vote with gimmick accts. Because Keira was winning you are assuming at least 10 of her votes were from gimmick accts?? Ridiculous [/ QUOTE ] Uh, no, I didn't vote with gimmick accounts, I'm pointing out that that accusation can fly both ways. To say it applies to only one candidate, if it is happening is absurd. [/ QUOTE ] the point was this. It was a 1 pt vote. Durron announces he is extending it a bit. ...already [/ QUOTE ] Without the same level of 'analysis' applied to the other candidate, this is meaningless. However, if anyone registered 10 gimmick acc'ts, pls out yourself to be fair. |
|
#88
|
|||
|
|||
|
it's 2PM let's move on
|
|
#89
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
However, if anyone registered 10 gimmick acc'ts, pls out yourself to be fair. [/ QUOTE ] i consulted with someone impartial. they point out that if there were 10 gimmick accounts (because it went 57-53 to like 58-63), then ana beatriz barros is still legitimately up by 4 votes, right? unless that person made even more gimmick accounts AFTER they put ana in a substantial lead |
|
#90
|
|||
|
|||
|
durron,
there are 11 registered users looking at this forum right now. how do you suppose there were 15-20 some votes in the past couple of hours (when you know the regulars had already voted by then) |
![]() |
|
|