Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 05-29-2006, 12:23 AM
Smoothcall Smoothcall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,714
Default Re: Alan Goerhing

Dids,

I wouldnt have continuee to answer it if he didnt dodge the question. He said he didn't say his play was better than hellmuths nd more complex and it makes him want to puke to compare hellmuths style to his. He said it did you see it? Then he says he didnt say it? Ok for now on i will only ask once and if he doesnt want to admit it i'll let him off the hook. But thats far from trolling. I'm not trolling dids. He answered me. If he didnt answer if the first place i wouldnt have ASKED agian but he answered ans said he didnt say it which was untrue imo. But i apologize if you took it as trolling. Lets start over and i'll try to be a good poster if you'll try not to be biased agaisnt me and cut me some slack like you do other posters. I wasnt trying to fight with him. I was respectful and complimented him on having better manners than both danial n and phil h. i just disagree he's superior to hellmuth is all. Why do i always come out looking like the bad guy when all i do is stick to the facts and post only facts. But again sorry and i'll try to adhere to what you want (no sarcasm)
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 05-29-2006, 12:56 AM
CrayZee CrayZee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Forum Donkey
Posts: 2,405
Default Re: Alan Goerhing

Yeah, he answered your questions and all, but you did seem pretty abrasive about it. Must be an internet thing.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 05-29-2006, 12:58 AM
wisehandpoker wisehandpoker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: twoplustwo
Posts: 2,326
Default Re: Alan Goerhing

Smooth, people in authority generally don't like to have that authority questioned, and most of the posters here want to keep those authorities around. I think you just need to tone it down a bit.
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 05-29-2006, 01:00 AM
John Shiznit John Shiznit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 203
Default Re: Alan Goerhing

Well it would be nice to see a database of every player performance for the WSOP and WPT for the last 4 years.
The best results would likely be
Tuan Le
Grinder
Gohring
Daniel N.
Ivey
Lingren?
Paul Phillips?
raymer?

The sample size is fairly small, but guys who people knew long before the WPT like ivey and daniel have been able to win and raymer has had some very high finishes in big field events since his WSOP win, which seem very statiscally unlikely(on luck alone).

Hellmuth has actually performed ok especially if you count the Heads up win but not as well as these guys have.


I know the people here massively hate on Tuan Le's play.
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 05-29-2006, 01:15 AM
glen glen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,019
Default Re: Alan Goerhing

you have to be the most annoying person ever. . . .
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 05-29-2006, 01:27 AM
wisehandpoker wisehandpoker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: twoplustwo
Posts: 2,326
Default Re: Alan Goerhing

[ QUOTE ]
Well it would be nice to see a database of every player performance for the WSOP and WPT for the last 4 years.
The best results would likely be
Tuan Le
Grinder
Gohring
Daniel N.
Ivey
Lingren?
Paul Phillips?
raymer?

The sample size is fairly small, but guys who people knew long before the WPT like ivey and daniel have been able to win and raymer has had some very high finishes in big field events since his WSOP win, which seem very statiscally unlikely(on luck alone).

Hellmuth has actually performed ok especially if you count the Heads up win but not as well as these guys have.


I know the people here massively hate on Tuan Le's play.

[/ QUOTE ]

multiple WPT wins:

Hansen
Negreanu
Lindgren
Gordon
Ros Rose
Lederer
Le
Goehring
Grinder

Tuan was taught by Barry Greenstein, but his reportedly loose play in the first three rounds of a tournament don't fit that mold.
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 05-29-2006, 02:00 AM
Smoothcall Smoothcall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,714
Default Re: Alan Goerhing

which authority are we referring to? And why do we want to keep them around? And why do i need to tone down a bit? i did nothing wrong. Just becasue people dont like semi-celebrities questioned doesnt mean i'm worng to do so. That is your problem not mine. I am cool. If you be cool we weill get along fine. I dont know why so many feel they need to tell me how i should post. Especially you when you have no authority.
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 05-29-2006, 02:24 AM
RussianBear RussianBear is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,463
Default Re: Alan Goerhing

[ QUOTE ]
($4.6mm gross winnings)

[/ QUOTE ]
According to this web site it's $ 5,078,777. I'll pm you my neteller information and we can take care of that extra 478,777.
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 05-29-2006, 02:27 AM
Number27 Number27 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,227
Default Re: Alan Goerhing

He said he wanted to puke because he had heard it so much. Not because Hellmuth's style made him want to puke. For instance if someone kept coming up to you and going, "You play like Player X" you'd probably get tired of hearing it.

As for whether he thinks he's better than Hellmuth at deep stack play who cares? It's an opinion, not a fact. What do you possibly hope to gain by badgering him about it?

How is he going to "back it up"? No one is saying you have to be deferential, they're just saying you keep repeatedly asking the same question and the answer isn't changing.
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 05-29-2006, 02:35 AM
wisehandpoker wisehandpoker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: twoplustwo
Posts: 2,326
Default Re: Alan Goerhing

[ QUOTE ]
which authority are we referring to? And why do we want to keep them around? And why do i need to tone down a bit? i did nothing wrong. Just becasue people dont like semi-celebrities questioned doesnt mean i'm worng to do so. That is your problem not mine. I am cool. If you be cool we weill get along fine. I dont know why so many feel they need to tell me how i should post. Especially you when you have no authority.

[/ QUOTE ]

The authority we're referring to is Alan, the guy with 2 WPT wins and a WSOP main event 2nd place finish. We want to keep him around to benefit from his wisdom and experience. You need to tone it down a bit because the attitude you employ has obviously alienated multiple posters of the authoritative variety, a fact a lot of people here don't like. The problem is yours because you're going to have to deal with being suspended from the site if you continue to agitate this way. We're trying to tell you how to post because the way you do so now is obviously alienating you and upsetting the aformentioned authorities the rest of us would like to see here. I never said anything about my having authority, i was just trying to be helpful in a moment of weakness.

Your reply comes off as defensive and agitated when my post was just trying to explain things in as unthreatening a way as I could word. Maybe that's why you 'come off as the bad guy'. I'm going to give up and pretend I didn't try now.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.