|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What do I do? | |||
| Call her and get the T-Shirt back before her psychopath ex finds it and kills my family and friends |
   
|
17 | 16.35% |
| Forget it and order another one |
  
|
7 | 6.73% |
| Order a Tuff_Fish T to replace |
  
|
29 | 27.88% |
| You are full of shit, anyone that orders (or wears) a T-shirt like that doesn't get any play |
  
|
51 | 49.04% |
| Voters: 104. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#821
05-17-2007, 02:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Need Stars $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
No. You get it in with 80% equity. You win 90% of the times. You have a positive number. That's what soah was talking about.
|
|
#822
05-17-2007, 02:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Need Stars $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
[ QUOTE ]
I'm + by a lot from my EV. I'm definitely running pretty hot, but I think i'm more running hot by hitting flops than by sucking out, so I don't know. In any case, those calculators are completely worthless since they don't address hand ranges. So basically if you get coolered for a month straight, you could look like you're running hot in that thing because you suck out once or twice more than you should. Total BS. [/ QUOTE ] TWP: Just wanted you to know that you made a post I 100% agree with. <3 |
|
#824
05-17-2007, 02:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Need Stars $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Just play good poker and forget this crap. [/ QUOTE ] yeah, not tilting is easy [/ QUOTE ] no, but reading comprehension should be. wtf. |
|
#825
05-17-2007, 02:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Need Stars $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
[ QUOTE ]
In any case, those calculators are completely worthless since they don't address hand ranges. [/ QUOTE ] um, how could you say that about Sklansky bucks vs actual buck in all-in pots? It is mathematically proven that Sklansky bucks earned are more likely going to be closer to your actual earn than actual bucks So 'completely worthless' seems a bit much |
|
#826
05-17-2007, 02:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Need Stars $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Just play good poker and forget this crap. [/ QUOTE ] yeah, not tilting is easy [/ QUOTE ] no, but reading comprehension should be. wtf. [/ QUOTE ] alright i'll spell it out for you: If I know I'm running bad in all in pots, I am less likely to tilt because of it |
|
#827
05-17-2007, 02:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Need Stars $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] In any case, those calculators are completely worthless since they don't address hand ranges. [/ QUOTE ] um, how could you say that about Sklansky bucks vs actual buck in all-in pots? It is mathematically proven that Sklansky bucks earned are more likely going to be closer to your actual earn than actual bucks So 'completely worthless' seems a bit much [/ QUOTE ] ok, completely worthless in determining anything about your game, how to improve it, or how much money you should be winning. yes, it is directionally correct in one part of the game. but that part of the game is not the most important determinant of your win rate and it's something you have no control over, so the total fixation on it is pretty stupid, IMO. But fine, if you guys want to keep checking how you're 'running' every month in all-in pots, go right ahead, i'll stop railing against it. |
|
#829
05-17-2007, 02:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Need Stars $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Just play good poker and forget this crap. [/ QUOTE ] yeah, not tilting is easy [/ QUOTE ] no, but reading comprehension should be. wtf. [/ QUOTE ] alright i'll spell it out for you: If I know I'm running bad in all in pots, I am less likely to tilt because of it [/ QUOTE ] why? this is so dumb, IMO. but hey, whatever works for you. if I know i'm running bad in all-in pots, but i've tilted off 5 buyins, who the heck cares about the all-in pots where you won zero of the time when you were really getting it in with a whopping 5% equity. whatever. i'm done. |
|
|
|
Linear Mode
