WSEX: Official Monthly Thread: June. (#10 of 10.)

[Pokeraddict]

I'm sure it does not help that NCAA hoops and NHL are over, NBA is almost over and there is little interest in the finals due to the matchup. Combine this slow time woth the processing problems and I'm sure some of that has to do with the lack of action.

I do not think there are any more players now as when they were full rake.

[Kinja]

wrong, its all in the marketing in the quest for new players. Sure as of now there are grinders playing etc, there are the people who know about online poker and rake. WPEX needs to start thinking like Party in regards to marketing and go after the masses. Talk to people who like to play in general and want to play. When its time for these poeple to sign up to give it a shot, they go where they heard of from various media, WPEX simply has to take a peice of that pie.

[Tuff_Fish]

[ QUOTE ]

.
.
Second off, you don't play at WPEX, you do not seem to have plans to play at WPEX in the future, so why TF do you care?
.
.


[/ QUOTE ]

I actually would consider playing at WSEX if I thought the games were good. And, of course, I could move funds on and off the site with some amount of ease. And they would let me change my screen name occasionally.

Funding and withdrawals probably play a large part of the lack of players problem. I have a problem sending several hundred dollars to Luis Honcho Grande in Nicaragua to fund my account. Were I to accumulate enough to need to withdraw, I have a problem waiting several weeks for a check. (That might have problems anyway).

If WSEX were that great, they would have all the players they wanted. It is not that great, thus no players.

Tuff

[PokerBob]

[ QUOTE ]

I actually would consider playing at WSEX if I thought the games were good.

[/ QUOTE ]

the games are great.

[larm]

6 max tables for the nano / micro limit tables (.05/.10-.25/.5) would be great!

[El_Hombre_Grande]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

I actually would consider playing at WSEX if I thought the games were good.

[/ QUOTE ]

the games are great.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's part of what is so frustrating. The higher stakes limit games are often juicy when they exist. They almost don't exist, though.

[PokerBob]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

I actually would consider playing at WSEX if I thought the games were good.

[/ QUOTE ]

the games are great.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's part of what is so frustrating. The higher stakes limit games are often juicy when they exist. They almost don't exist, though.

[/ QUOTE ]

i don't play high stakes.

[DING-DONG YO]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

.
.
Second off, you don't play at WPEX, you do not seem to have plans to play at WPEX in the future, so why TF do you care?
.
.


[/ QUOTE ]

I actually would consider playing at WSEX if I thought the games were good. And, of course, I could move funds on and off the site with some amount of ease. And they would let me change my screen name occasionally.

Funding and withdrawals probably play a large part of the lack of players problem. I have a problem sending several hundred dollars to Luis Honcho Grande in Nicaragua to fund my account. Were I to accumulate enough to need to withdraw, I have a problem waiting several weeks for a check. (That might have problems anyway).

[/ QUOTE ]

So, now that your rake argument has been ripped apart and debunked, you're going to start throwing out baseless accusations?!

WPEX has consistently been one of the most reliable sites for cashouts and deposits.

WTF are you talking about? Nicarauga? What the hell?

So which is it Tuff? do you not play there because of their rakeback structure or because of the lack of games?!? Sounds to me like the reason you don't play there is anything you think people will listen to.

What exactly is wrong with you? Why do you have this ax to grind with WPEX?

[ QUOTE ]
If WSEX were that great, they would have all the players they wanted. It is not that great, thus no players.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is this comment a joke? Is your thinking truly this one dimensional?

[BuddyQ]

Tuff, you are known idiot and buffoon, please stop trying to think - just go back to making me laugh. Ok? Thx.

(In case you didn;t know: Buffoon:
n 1: a rude or vulgar fool
2: a person who amuses others by ridiculous behavior [syn: clown]

[Tuff_Fish]

[ QUOTE ]

.
.

So, now that your rake argument has been ripped apart and debunked, you're going to start throwing out baseless accusations?!

WPEX has consistently been one of the most reliable sites for cashouts and deposits.
.
.
so I have heard... not.
.
.

WTF are you talking about? Nicarauga? What the hell?
.
.

OK, that was about Moneygram. I don't know if they use that or not. Bottom line, there is no way to get money on and off the site easily.
.
.

So which is it Tuff? do you not play there because of their rakeback structure or because of the lack of games?!? Sounds to me like the reason you don't play there is anything you think people will listen to.
.
.


I dislike the fact it is rakeback, not rake free. I intensly dislike the idea of nits sitting around waiting for the nuts and collecting a piece of every pot. if it were rakefree, one could steal the nits blind. As it is, they still get a little piece of every pot, enough to justify sitting on their hands til they wake up with a premium hand.

No good funding method on and off.

A dearth of games.

Did I mention I dislike the rakeback structure?
.
.

What exactly is wrong with you? Why do you have this ax to grind with WPEX?
.
.
see above
.
.

[ QUOTE ]
If WSEX were that great, they would have all the players they wanted. It is not that great, thus no players.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is this comment a joke? no Is your thinking truly this one dimensional?

[/ QUOTE ]

If anyone wants to play with grinders and shills, let em, it is their right. It is my right to voice an opinion about what is wrong.

I am glad WSEX is taking a shot at doing something different. I think, however, they missed the mark with rakeback vs rakefree.

Tuff