Discovery Channel : MAN VS WILD or SURVIVORMAN?

[bluey]

i watch discovery channel like 6 hours every day. ive seen man vs wild probably like 30 times this month. many repeats. ive only seen survivorman twice i think. obv discovery channel knows which is better.

[JimmyGunz]

man vs wild

[rubbrband]

I have all man vs wild and most survivor man on dvr. Man vs wild is much better. Survivor man is more realistic with no camera crew but then him toting around the cameras takes a lot away it. Having a camera crew follow you is def +ev for the show.

[chadmack]

[ QUOTE ]
Having a camera crew follow you is def +ev for the show.

[/ QUOTE ]

but it's not as balla

[tarheeljks]

man v wild

[CaptainBusto]

[ QUOTE ]
Regardless of how the show is taped, it's painfully obvious who's more of a badass:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Les_Stroud (SM)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear_Grylls (MW)

[/ QUOTE ]
i havent seen man vs wild and i quite like survivorman, but....
with names like LES vs BEAR im afraid this one is a non contest.

[T50_Omaha8]

If you've ever climbed on the tounge of a glacier you'd realize that purposefully decending into an ice tunnel is vastly -EV. This advice is clearly just for TV.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJbLQnTQDtc

[Full-Metall]

Bear Gryll without camera crew.

[Shadowrun]

Both shows are good, i feel like a lot of the "tips" on MvW are way too advanced/hardcore for someone that is unexperienced.

I dont watch either of these shows to learn how to "survive"

As far as comparing the hosts, Bear was in the SAS + all the other stuff (other posts already have it)

[Number27]

[ QUOTE ]
Bear Gryll without camera crew.


[/ QUOTE ]

Bear Grylls would break survivorman's neck and drink his spinal fluid for sustenance.