Disturbing family photo...Had to share......NSFW

[daryn]

[ QUOTE ]
Bizzare? Totally -- thank God those are not my parents.

Child Abuse? Not even close.

[/ QUOTE ]

exactly. this sums it up perfectly.

[Luckboxer]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Bizzare? Totally -- thank God those are not my parents.

Child Abuse? Not even close.

[/ QUOTE ]

exactly. this sums it up perfectly.

[/ QUOTE ]

Even if you are right, I wouldn't be surprised at all if a prosecutor got a successful child pornography conviction based on photos like this.

[bwana devil]

[ QUOTE ]
Bizzare? Totally -- thank God those are not my parents.

Child Abuse? Not even close.

[/ QUOTE ]

i assume dad doesnt exercise good judgment and i question the sexual boundaries in the house. what father would allow his five year old daughter to fondle his fake genitalia for a family picture? this is a sign of a bigger problem.

[[Phill]]

Bwana, see dominics post a few up. It is tightly controlled sexual barriers that lead to most child abuse.

This is one picture with no real context. Maybe the girl was like "wtf is that?" Maybe she was asked to by the pedo photographer. I think it is much more likely the first than the last of those two extremes.

[ QUOTE ]
Even if you are right, I wouldn't be surprised at all if a prosecutor got a successful child pornography conviction based on photos like this.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sadly, you are probably right.

There are cases where nudists have been prosecuted for their family albums. There was a girl like the other day prosecuted for posting pics of herself online wasnt there?

Unfortunately common sense is rare in law.

[Blarg]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm sorry to say you have been seriously brain-washed by the secular left in America.

I am a member of this "secular left" and I find this image concerning. I'm not sure why you decided to try and turn this into a right/left issue but nice work.

[/ QUOTE ]

The type who actually manages to choke out a reason for decrying "the secular left" always does this. It takes a nut to think genitalia are either secular or left-wing.

As for me, I blame the unions! Plus, too much flouridation in our water.

[Jay.]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Honestly, i dont see how this is weird or disturbing.

Do people consider this more or less weird than nudism?

Do you really think the girl touching her fathers 'penis' (or for that matter his actualy penis) is abusive?

You guys really need to get a grip with reality here.

[/ QUOTE ]

How many times have you touched your father's weiner? If never, why have you never touched your father's weiner? I'll bet it's because it's weird or disturbing.

Looking and touching are two completely different things. Nudist families don't fondle eachother AFAIK.

[/ QUOTE ]

the girl is not touching her father's penis. At all. She's touching cloth.

[/ QUOTE ]

So in your world, pretend child molestation is not really a big deal? It is ok to imply it, just not do it; does that sum it up? Please tell me you do not have children your own.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol wtf, 'pretend child molestation'. the daughter turned around and checked it out.


... had he been winking at the camera then fine.

[bottomset]

wtf

[JuntMonkey]

[ QUOTE ]


wtf

[/ QUOTE ]

How did you get to that? Changing the numbers you can see a few more (with different people/families), but they're just in the background of pictures taken in the art gallery.

[john voight]

[ QUOTE ]
Bizzare? Totally -- thank God those are not my parents.

Child Abuse? Not even close.

[/ QUOTE ]

This coming from a guy who has been repeatedly accusing the ppl in the Asian Parlor thread as sick degens.

So its okey for me to dress up in a suite and let my 8 year old daughter stroke I fake penis, but I cross the line when I pay a 20 year old chick to screw me.

Brilliant.

[JJNJustin]

I am somehow not bothered by the little girl fondling the penis so much as by the perfectly traingular shaped incredibly thick pubic hair of the woman.

-J