Election! - The Game Thread

[HerbieGRD]

Ok I am sure it is obvious to you all but I will say it anyways - I am a terrible choice for the council. In the words of William Tecumsah Sherman - If nominated I will not run, if elected I will not serve.

As for who we should vote for - sure it is easy to support a moderate like Traz or Xorbie but I am a liberal at heart. And it is quite clear to me that there is one candidate here who is more liberal (WRT WW) than any other.

As a result - I will Support LuckayLuck and will likely vote for him later.

BTW Nich - cool theme and very complicated game - I love it

[traz]

[ QUOTE ]
I don't get what's the deal with "supporting." Does it have any effect on the game?

[/ QUOTE ]

not really, just a way of tabulating how the winds are blowing

[xorbie]

[ QUOTE ]

9 wolves seems like a lot, especially when wolves may control the vote any particular day

[/ QUOTE ]

really? if the village loses id be surprised... no doubt luckay and shorty might find a way to blow it, but with 2 seers, 2 doctors, assassin, voting block and the investigator we should have about half the village confirmed by day five.

[Nicholasp27]

***Question***

Can the electorate elect someone on the council?

No. The three players voted onto the electorate cannot be elected (lynched) that day. That is, the other 2 cannot turn on the third to get rid of him


You talked about possibly ending days early to get two in ones. But with vote buyers in the game, are you still considering this?

Day will end early when all alive players have put in a vote during the day. We will make a decision on deadlines at that time depending on what time it is, etc.

[Spook]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


What is the logic behind this list?

[/ QUOTE ]
if there is a wolf on the council, id think they would be found pretty quickly, just from assassin/seers, so its really just a matter of getting people who can spot wolves well and not just do whatever other people say.

[/ QUOTE ]

My main problem with the list was that I am on it. I am a pretty lousy player who hasn't played since early December and hadn't posted in thread yet. But I am good at not being night killed. Any time someone tries to say how 'good' I am I tend to think they are evil.

[LuckayLuck]

I feel like this should be our play TODAY:

Voting Bloc - EVERYBODY ON THE VOTING BLOC, CLAIM. All 4 of you, vote for one target. NOBODY ELSE VOTE FOR THAT TARGET.

Village places exactly 6 votes on 3 different targets, everybody else can just place a vote on random people.

This way, we can 100% clear the voting bloc.
Anybody want to debate the merits / downfalls of this plan? It's pretty meritorious imo.

[wdcbooks]

Dudes my list was random. Basically I will support anyone who isn't dumb. Mdorand and Bram definitely fit in that description.

[fmxda]

I support LuckayLuck

[xorbie]

[ QUOTE ]
I feel like this should be our play TODAY:

Voting Bloc - EVERYBODY ON THE VOTING BLOC, CLAIM. All 4 of you, vote for one target. NOBODY ELSE VOTE FOR THAT TARGET.

Village places exactly 6 votes on 3 different targets, everybody else can just place a vote on random people.

This way, we can 100% clear the voting bloc.
Anybody want to debate the merits / downfalls of this plan? It's pretty meritorious imo.

[/ QUOTE ]

clown's plan is better imo.

[LuckayLuck]

[ QUOTE ]
I feel like this should be our play TODAY:

Voting Bloc - EVERYBODY ON THE VOTING BLOC, CLAIM. All 4 of you, vote for one target. NOBODY ELSE VOTE FOR THAT TARGET.

Village places exactly 6 votes on 3 different targets, everybody else can just place a vote on random people.

This way, we can 100% clear the voting bloc.
Anybody want to debate the merits / downfalls of this plan? It's pretty meritorious imo.

[/ QUOTE ]

wait
no
bad plan bad plan

what happens with evil vote buyer + voting bloc interaction?