|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: From the BB I am losing PTBB/hand | |||
| I am making a profit (and am sure of that) |
   
|
1 | 3.57% |
| 0.00 - 0.05 |
  
|
2 | 7.14% |
| 0.05 - 0.10 |
  
|
4 | 14.29% |
| 0.10 - 0.15 |
  
|
6 | 21.43% |
| 0.15 - 0.20 |
  
|
2 | 7.14% |
| 0.20 - 0.25 |
  
|
2 | 7.14% |
| 0.25 - 0.30 |
|
2 | 7.14% |
| 0.30 - 0.35 |
|
0 | 0% |
| 0.35 - 0.40 |
|
0 | 0% |
| 0.40 - 0.45 |
|
2 | 7.14% |
| 0.45-0.50 |
|
0 | 0% |
| results only |
|
7 | 25.00% |
| Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#761
01-21-2007, 10:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***OFFICIAL AFC TITLE GAME pats @ COLTS ***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Brady has ice water in his veinaments. What a dodge of the defender and then pass to back of endzone. This game is getting really really goodaments. [/ QUOTE ]Seriously...thats getting overlooked right now due to the controversy. He throws a TD on 2nd down only to have it dropped and then comes back and does that on 3rd. [/ QUOTE ] His side stepping that colts defender was a truly amazing play and is being vastly overlooked. [/ QUOTE ] Everyone is too busy saying "THERES NO WAY HE GETS BOTH FEETS IN ZOMG!" When it really was much closer than that. Seriously, his second leg didnt start moving out until he was hit. I don't get it. Where is the controversy? Give it a restament 
|
|
#762
01-21-2007, 10:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***OFFICIAL AFC TITLE GAME pats @ COLTS ***
While I agree in that wishful thinking, the real change happened when Manning stopped trying to throw deep every time and going back to the short completions. The game plan has improved big time.
|
|
#763
01-21-2007, 10:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***OFFICIAL AFC TITLE GAME pats @ COLTS ***
Ya Ha....
December 31, 1994...GB 16, Det 10 "Then on fourth down and 14 from the 17-yard line, Detroit wide receiver Herman Moore caught Krieg's pass at the back of the end zone, but came out of bounds past the end line. Afterwards, Green Bay ran out the rest of the clock, giving up an intentional safety on the last play of the contest." Maybe I was young and stupid, but to this day I swear he was pushed out and would have had a TD if not for being pushed out. I am so glad I found that though...It has always bothered me I couldn't remember the details.
|
|
#765
01-21-2007, 10:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***OFFICIAL AFC TITLE GAME pats @ COLTS ***
ZOMG CATCHAMENTS
|
|
#767
01-21-2007, 10:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***OFFICIAL AFC TITLE GAME pats @ COLTS ***
Rules question regarding the WR coming down in bounds if not for the defender hitting him. Is the rule:
A. Its a catch if the WR would've definitely come down in bounds B. Its a catch if the WR would've come down in bounds over 50% of the time C. Its a catch if the WR had a reasonable chance at coming down in bounds D. Its a catch if the WR had any chance at all of coming down in bounds Anyone know this for sure? Because it seems pretty silly for us to be arguing over the play when I'd bet that the majority of us aren't really even certain of the rule.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
