|
|
#61
04-03-2006, 11:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: how can this NOT be collusion?
I like how OP handled this. Keeping names out in OP lets people first decide on the issue without having to call out a name player. Once conclusiions are reached, then its cool to let it out.
|
|
#62
04-04-2006, 12:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: how can this NOT be collusion?
[ QUOTE ]
I like how OP handled this. Keeping names out in OP lets people first decide on the issue without having to call out a name player. Once conclusiions are reached, then its cool to let it out. [/ QUOTE ] No it's not. Just post the HH. There is nothing to hide. The HH are public anyway.
|
|
#63
04-04-2006, 07:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: how can this NOT be collusion?
i just read this thread just now... is it at all possible that player b doesn't use the 4 color deck and thought he actually had a flush draw (and pounded it on the turn) and thought he hit a flush on the river so he raised? i know i have done that a couple of times, not at these stakes of course.
i agree with josh, if player a made a big laydown, then this may not be as bad as it appears, though it does look bad no matter how you cut it.
|
|
#64
04-04-2006, 09:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: how can this NOT be collusion?
im [censored] savagegamble someone told me about this, this is some [censored] get my name out of these post or prove it, ill give my bankroll to anyone that can I dont need to cheat to win so post these supposive hands up, perhaps its some donk he got killed in the game and is just making escuses
|
|
#65
04-04-2006, 09:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: how can this NOT be collusion?
[ QUOTE ]
im [censored] savagegamble someone told me about this, this is some [censored] get my name out of these post or prove it, ill give my bankroll to anyone that can I dont need to cheat to win so post these supposive hands up, perhaps its some donk he got killed in the game and is just making escuses [/ QUOTE ] wow. I can tell already this is going to be a respectful debate.
|
|
#66
04-04-2006, 09:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: how can this NOT be collusion?
[ QUOTE ]
im [censored] savagegamble someone told me about this, this is some [censored] get my name out of these post or prove it, ill give my bankroll to anyone that can I dont need to cheat to win so post these supposive hands up, perhaps its some donk he got killed in the game and is just making escuses [/ QUOTE ] LOL
|
|
#67
04-04-2006, 09:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: how can this NOT be collusion?
[ QUOTE ]
im [censored] savagegamble someone told me about this, this is some [censored] get my name out of these post or prove it, ill give my bankroll to anyone that can I dont need to cheat to win so post these supposive hands up, perhaps its some donk he got killed in the game and is just making escuses [/ QUOTE ] The hand history was already posted above and you're not in it.
|
|
#68
04-04-2006, 10:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: how can this NOT be collusion?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] im [censored] savagegamble someone told me about this, this is some [censored] get my name out of these post or prove it, ill give my bankroll to anyone that can I dont need to cheat to win so post these supposive hands up, perhaps its some donk he got killed in the game and is just making escuses [/ QUOTE ] The hand history was already posted above and you're not in it. [/ QUOTE ] dumbanimal on party/ub = savagegamble on ub/stars and whatever other sites
|
|
#69
04-04-2006, 10:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: how can this NOT be collusion?
[ QUOTE ]
I looked at the hand history and it's not those dumbanimal and savagegamble. Those two are the <font color="blue"> </font> same player anyway <font color="blue"> </font> . It was dumbanimal, a player who i would put in the suspicious category, and a random unknown player who just happenst to jump right into 300-600. What a joke. [/ QUOTE ] For someone who is the same player its weird they were at the same table recently, He might be a dumbanimal but he has to be smarter than that if its his 2 accounts
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
