|
|
#61
02-28-2007, 09:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Jamie Westenhiser - Hot Chick NSFW
I think people who get all worked up over other's criticality are funny. Of course, most people here would "do" her and she's obviously incredibly hot. But that doesn't mean she's perfect. And giving her less than a 9 is merely pointing out what isn't perfect about her.
It's the same as people criticising Bill Gates for bad money decisions despite the fact that he's made about $50 billion more than you ever will in your life. Or calling a WR "slow" because he runs a 4.50 second 40, even though the person calling him slow couldn't run a 7 second 40. Different people are judged by different standards. E.g., you're next door neighbor may be the most attractive woman you know in real life. But if she were a movie star (or Playboy Playmate), you'd be comparing her to other movie stars and Playmates. 
|
|
#62
02-28-2007, 09:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Jamie Westenhiser - Hot Chick NSFW
[ QUOTE ]
You and Fluffpop would be mid 8s (I realize that quick scale kinda jump from "low end hot" to "supermodel" so it needs to be refined), ali and ten mid 7s, kk and gorie are mid-low 6s. [/ QUOTE ] Dids means that determining accurate ratings requires a large amount of revealing pics. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Chick in the pic is at least 8 tho.
|
|
#64
02-28-2007, 10:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Jamie Westenhiser - Hot Chick NSFW
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Big thumbs down on this on bro. Definitely not worthy of OOT postage. major neg for extreme airbrushing and obviously plastic titties. Minor neg for cheesy photo shoot props. [/ QUOTE ] Basically. She's hot, probably a high 7 low 8, but that's not really hot enough to go running around and making threads. [/ QUOTE ] Right on cue, the doughiest denizen of OOT proves me right. [/ QUOTE ] this is like the 3rd thread i've seen you use the word 'doughy' to describe OOT posters. [/ QUOTE ] Am I wrong?
|
|
#67
02-28-2007, 11:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Jamie Westenhiser - Hot Chick NSFW
I think she is very very pretty, but I really feel like airbrushing doesn't help anyone's case. There are so many people I know that look absolutely stunning without airbrushing (like in real life) that it makes me wonder what these girls would look like without the photoshop.
|
|
#69
02-28-2007, 11:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Jamie Westenhiser - Hot Chick NSFW
[ QUOTE ]
I think she is very very pretty, but I really feel like airbrushing doesn't help anyone's case. There are so many people I know that look absolutely stunning without airbrushing (like in real life) that it makes me wonder what these girls would look like without the photoshop. [/ QUOTE ] Playboy Playmates look amazing in real life. They're like ambassadors for the magazine. I met maybe a dozen at the mansion, and even the older ones (40+, maybe 50+) look gorgeous. The airbrushing in Playboy is not, as people apparently think, to make plain girls hot or something. It's to turn stunning women into flawless archetypes, purposefully unattainable ideals of sexual beauty. I bet there were a-holes* in ancient Greece who complained that the statues of nude figures were "too perfect"; where were the stretch marks, saggy [censored], and crow's feet on Venus? *Not to be construed to mean that any particular poster in this thread is an a-hole for not liking airbrushed nudes.
|
|
#70
02-28-2007, 11:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Jamie Westenhiser - Hot Chick NSFW
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think she is very very pretty, but I really feel like airbrushing doesn't help anyone's case. There are so many people I know that look absolutely stunning without airbrushing (like in real life) that it makes me wonder what these girls would look like without the photoshop. [/ QUOTE ] Playboy Playmates look amazing in real life. They're like ambassadors for the magazine. I met maybe a dozen at the mansion, and even the older ones (40+, maybe 50+) look gorgeous. The airbrushing in Playboy is not, as people apparently think, to make plain girls hot or something. It's to turn stunning women into flawless archetypes, purposefully unattainable ideals of sexual beauty. I bet there were a-holes* in ancient Greece who complained that the statues of nude figures were "too perfect"; where were the stretch marks, saggy [censored], and crow's feet on Venus? *Not to be construed to mean that any particular poster in this thread is an a-hole for not liking airbrushed nudes. [/ QUOTE ] See, I think the airbrushing makes them look like cartoons.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
