Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 02-16-2007, 07:46 AM
SuperUberBob SuperUberBob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: In a dirty apartment
Posts: 6,560
Default Re: \"Official\" Poker After Dark thread (Week 6 - Poker Commentators We

Konik just seems to be out of place on PAD.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 02-16-2007, 11:06 AM
primetime32 primetime32 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,251
Default Re: \"Official\" Poker After Dark thread (Week 6 - Poker Commentators We

I loved Phil Gordon insisting that AsQh was 77 percent against A-10(hearts). and gordon folded 73, so it wasn't like he held a 10 and recalculated the odds. Lederer looked at him like he was an alien.

And yes, konik is by far the worst player at the table.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 02-16-2007, 11:17 AM
Hotel Detect Hotel Detect is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 282
Default Re: \"Official\" Poker After Dark thread (Week 6 - Poker Commentators We

[ QUOTE ]
I loved Phil Gordon insisting that AsQh was 77 percent against A-10(hearts). and gordon folded 73, so it wasn't like he held a 10 and recalculated the odds. Lederer looked at him like he was an alien.

And yes, konik is by far the worst player at the table.

[/ QUOTE ]

Phil definitely looked silly on this one (even i knew it wasnt 75%, and im not a big math guy)...

Konik seemed promising early on (does not mean he was playing well, that was just the impression i got) - but then he got really impatient. I mean blinds were at 600/1200 weren't they? He had a limper utg and he pushed 5 handed (with the blinds left to act) with 14k chips - i mean i guess its borderline but i really dont like a push with a weak ace here. Seemed like he was panicing.

I guess with the winner take all format you could argue that it was the right move.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 02-16-2007, 01:40 PM
Dominic Dominic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vegas
Posts: 12,772
Default Re: \"Official\" Poker After Dark thread (Week 6 - Poker Commentators We

I've been lucky enough to either interview or play with all of these guys except for Konik, and I must say you guys are dead wrong about Phil Gordon. He's one of the nicest, friendliest guys I've ever met. He's very happy-go-lucky and loves to have fun.

Howard is nice enough and friendly in that "poker-table-friends" kind of way.

Mike Sexton is amazingly gracious and always has time to talk. He's also very funny.

Gabe is Gabe...what you see is what you get. Either you like his schtick or you don't.

Chad Brown is very humble, very nice and works incredibly hard at improving his poker. While I don't think he's very good at hosting/commentating, that doesn't detract from his having an enormous amount of class.

******

I really loved how the whole table started ribbing Konik about folding AJs on the button...

PAD is very entertaining...I'm liking this better than HSP right now.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 02-16-2007, 02:14 PM
Rottersod Rottersod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Where I Want To Be
Posts: 3,154
Default Re: \"Official\" Poker After Dark thread (Week 6 - Poker Commentators We

Did you see how pissed Gabe was about folding T9s against a raise and re-raise, when the T9 hit on the flop. I know a lot of players who would have made that call with that hand because it is exactly the type of hand that can crack large pocket pairs. It seemed to me that he was getting the right implied odds to make that call. He would have felted Sexton.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 02-16-2007, 02:49 PM
big dummy big dummy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 72
Default Re: \"Official\" Poker After Dark thread (Week 6 - Poker Commentators We

[ QUOTE ]

He made a good read on this hand, but still screwed it up by just calling the turn bet instead of raising. The problem being that Howard can't beat a bluff, so he can't call a river bet even if he thinks Kaplan is bluffing. If Kaplan ever fires a third barrel Howard has to give up on the hand. If he thinks Kaplan is weak he needs to raise the turn, while he still has enough chips to bluff. This has the added bonus of denying Kaplan a free card if he has a weak pair/draw.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't remember the stack/pot sizes, but I'm pretty sure that a reasonable turn raise would have required Howard to commit all his chips. If I recall, Gabe's turn bet was smallish, and I know Howard's "value" river was small. So Howard achieved his objective without risking many chips. How exactly is this wrong?
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 02-16-2007, 03:07 PM
Runner Runner Runner Runner is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Better then Elezra
Posts: 749
Default Re: \"Official\" Poker After Dark thread (Week 6 - Poker Commentators We

A few things I noticed in the 4th episode.

Brown has had horrible luck, everyone is holding over him.

Konik is really annoying, asking for chip counts of players who put in raises BEFORE looking at his cards. Also, I don't like the way he played the turn on the hand where Gabe had him outkicked. I think if he is going to play it for all Gabe's chips he should check-raise or bet allin on the turn. Also, I don't like his push with A3 after Gabe limped, especially since no one was limping for a while. Also, I think he is divulging info about his moderately strong hands by always talking about them before he makes his decision, this probably was part of the reason he didn't play the AJs hand.

Howard making fun of Gordon for not insta-calling on the Aces full hand is priceless.

Sexton's big flop bet on that all diamond board seemed real sloppy to me. A smaller bet could have gotten the job done I think. He didn't have to double Howard up there.

I am really rooting for Gabe to win. Howard and Gordon have shown they can really outplay him, but this thing is quickly turning into a crapshoot with the higher blinds.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 02-16-2007, 03:22 PM
Passaman Passaman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 847
Default Re: \"Official\" Poker After Dark thread (Week 6 - Poker Commentators We

What was funnier than Kaplan saying "I have a gym in my house but my family formed a club and won't let me join."

That was hilarious.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 02-16-2007, 06:08 PM
dlk9s dlk9s is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: It\'s not gonna happen.
Posts: 3,410
Default Re: \"Official\" Poker After Dark thread (Week 6 - Poker Commentators We

[ QUOTE ]

Konik is really annoying, asking for chip counts of players who put in raises BEFORE looking at his cards.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's not uncommon. Nothing annoying about it.
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 02-16-2007, 06:11 PM
List List is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 184
Default Re: \"Official\" Poker After Dark thread (Week 6 - Poker Commentators We

[ QUOTE ]
I'm pretty sure that a reasonable turn raise would have required Howard to commit all his chips.

[/ QUOTE ]

No, he had enough chips that he didn't have to raise quite all in to push Gabe off a bluff/mid pair. However, he was short enough that he can't bluff raise river if Gabe leads it out.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.