Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Science, Math, and Philosophy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: I hate dids because
He insulted me once and is generally caustic and abusive to people who are not down with his team 18 40.00%
I find his posts non-awesome 25 55.56%
He MOD RAMPAGED~! at me and I'm bitter 2 4.44%
Voters: 45. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 11-18-2006, 11:13 PM
txag007 txag007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,428
Default Re: Do you agree with the following statement?

How can you pronounce something false without evaluating the reasons for its growth?

How can you be so sure Islam isn't actually the true religion?
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 11-18-2006, 11:26 PM
txag007 txag007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,428
Default Re: Do you agree with the following statement?

Islam is growing because people believe in it, but how did it start? By one founder who gained power and wealth because of it during his lifetime.

Christianity is growing because people believe in it, but how did the Church start? By numerous founders who lost their lives because of it.

Which one is more likely to be true?
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 11-18-2006, 11:36 PM
MidGe MidGe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Shame on you, Blackwater!
Posts: 3,908
Default Re: Do you agree with the following statement?

[ QUOTE ]
Which one is more likely to be true?

[/ QUOTE ]

The single author one, obviously!
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 11-18-2006, 11:43 PM
Lestat Lestat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,304
Default Re: Do you agree with the following statement?

[ QUOTE ]
Islam is growing because people believe in it, but how did it start? By one founder who gained power and wealth because of it during his lifetime.

Christianity is growing because people believe in it, but how did the Church start? By numerous founders who lost their lives because of it.

Which one is more likely to be true?

[/ QUOTE ]

So Islam was founded by one man and grew because people believed in it, and Christianity was founded by one man and grew because people believed in it. (correct me if I'm wrong here. I don't claim to be all that knowledgable about Christianity. But it's my understanding that Christianity branched off from Judaism after Christ. They even use the same bibles except for the NT).

So the big difference you seem to be clinging to is that some of the early church founders died because of their beliefs. Is there anything else? Do you have anything more? Do you know for a fact that none of the early Muslims died because of what they believed? Some of them certainly seem willing to die for their beliefs now, don't they?

Even if ZERO Mulsims died because of their beliefs (and I doubt that and I'll try to look into early Islam when I more time), it STILL doesn't place significant weight on Christianity being the one and only correct religion!

The problem here, is that you're unwilling to step outside of your beliefs for even one second and take a look around from ANY other different perspective. So it's hard to keep up a logical dialog with you, because you're arguments are all based on presuppositions which you're not willing to let go of long enough to look at things objectively.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 11-18-2006, 11:49 PM
txag007 txag007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,428
Default Re: Do you agree with the following statement?

Biblical archaeologist William Foxwell Albright in a Christianity Today interview, January 18, 1963:

"In my opinion, every book of the New Testament was written by a baptized Jew between the forties and the eighties of the first century A.D. (very probably sometime between A.D. 50 and 75)...Thanks to the Qumran discoveries, the New Testament proves to be in fact what it was formerly believed to be: the teachings of Christ and his immediate followers between cir.25 and cir.80 A.D."
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 11-18-2006, 11:55 PM
txag007 txag007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,428
Default Re: Do you agree with the following statement?

The founders of the church were in the immediate position to know if they were dying for a false belief.

Early Muslims were not in the position to know if they were dying for a false belief because their belief was directly reliant on the truth of Mohammed's visions.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 11-18-2006, 11:55 PM
txag007 txag007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,428
Default Re: Do you agree with the following statement?

Why?
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 11-18-2006, 11:58 PM
Prodigy54321 Prodigy54321 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 5,326
Default Re: Do you agree with the following statement?

[ QUOTE ]
I'm asking for theories, if it is false, as to why that may be and how christianity grew in spite of that. So far nobody has come forward with such a theory.

[/ QUOTE ]

alright...

Jesus lived..at some point he and others believed that he was the son of god since he aparently fulfilled preophecies and such...he had mroe and more followers...he got crucified..later on, stories of his life and death were told and eventually written down even hunreds of years later..the religion grew...

sweet theory, eh?...that's my best guess since we have close to no knowledge of what actually happened.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 11-19-2006, 12:00 AM
Prodigy54321 Prodigy54321 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 5,326
Default Re: Do you agree with the following statement?

[ QUOTE ]
The founders of the church were in the immediate position to know if they were dying for a false belief.


[/ QUOTE ]

how so?
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 11-19-2006, 12:06 AM
chezlaw chezlaw is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: corridor of uncertainty
Posts: 6,642
Default Re: Do you agree with the following statement?

[ QUOTE ]
I'm asking for theories. Simple as that.

[/ QUOTE ]
You're not. You're suggesting that there's some problem that requires in depth historical knowledge to resolve.

There simply isn't any such problem.

Its just a tactic that you use again and again to try to obsure the nature of your unreasonable beliefs (or as you like the weight of DS's words: moronic beliefs).

chez
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.