Do you trust ongame (pokerroom, hollywood and even daniels fullcontact

[JoaoPinto]

[ QUOTE ]
I have been playing on pokespoker.com for some time now that they have offered a strong rake back deal. When my account was blocked i instantly emailed the OWNER of the site.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
Your money was successfully transferred from our systems to FutureBet on August 6. At the highest levels, management from our two companies are discussing why you are only getting paid on September 13 after making this issue public.

[/ QUOTE ]

Pokerroom, FCP, BetOnBet, Pokespoker, FutureBet ....my head hurts. Which sites didn't give him his money?

[TylerD]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I have been playing on pokespoker.com for some time now that they have offered a strong rake back deal. When my account was blocked i instantly emailed the OWNER of the site.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
Your money was successfully transferred from our systems to FutureBet on August 6. At the highest levels, management from our two companies are discussing why you are only getting paid on September 13 after making this issue public.

[/ QUOTE ]

Pokerroom, FCP, BetOnBet, Pokespoker, FutureBet ....my head hurts. Which sites didn't give him his money?

[/ QUOTE ]

PokesPoker's cashier system is powered by FutureBet, it seems it is they who are the problem.

[AceCR9]

Futurebet is the cashout system for I believe 40+ Ongame network skins. Yes there are really that many. Individual skins do not handle any of the money, futurebet does. They are the problem. Thats why PR.com, Hollywood, and a few othersites that do their own cashouts may have problems with individual players, but never a lot of them at once.


If as many HSNL players play on pokes as I think, the network should be working thir ass off to make good. We pay a ton of rake, and I doubt the network would want to lose a lot of regular customers.

However the games would be extremely good if we all left [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]


durrr brought up a good point- people(myself included) take risks because we feel playing on certain sites is more +ev for us. risk vs. reward.

[Jord4n]

I just wanted to add something...after reading this entire thread I noticed some posts in regards to FCP posters, and I wanted to address that.

I have been a FCPer for a while, and I guess I never really kept up with "board" feuds, but I think it's silly that there seems to be animosity between the two boards.

The issue at hand should be one every online poker player should take seriously and work together to make right. It just seems a lot of these "feuds" between forums are built up and then taken up by members of the forum "just cause". Similar to one highschool hating another because of a sport.

It's just silly.

I hope this issue gets resolved, as it seems it is starting to. I keep a little money on pokerroom, and have never had issues, including cashing out a large some from their Grand Tournament, which I think we can all agree on as being the best tournament on the net (besides not having antes, which is incredibly horrible).

Hopefully these kinds of topics become less and less as the networks learn that this kind of stuff can't be tolerated without proof of evidence.

And as for the animosity between the boards...if there really is any...just remember on issues like this there shouldn't be any "enemies"...I think everyone would agree that stuff like this needs to be fought, and the best way to fight it is to stand together.

- Jordan

[pig4bill]

Wait a second. People in this thread freely admitted to playing under other people's accounts. I seldom play online, so I'm asking is this considered acceptable? I may think I have a read on a certain player, but the next time I see that person at my table, I may be royally screwed because some different person is actually playing?

[irishcurve08]

I just made along post and now for some reason it didnt post so i will try and remember what it said...

First i just recenrly read what ongame said. I was never informaed i was gonna get paid out. the owner told me that i was never going ot see any of it. Mabe he saw a weay to pocket 60k who knows....

Secondly all the people who claim i actually did collude...dont jump to conclusions. Yes i know certain players personally that doesnt mean i cheat. I know many people from stars that are best friends off the table yet they still sit day in and day out at the same table. You think in vegas the pros never go out to dinner or hang out off the tables,,,you're right because that would definately mean collusion. Many times god friends sit at the same table and if they get in a pot together they check it down, which is perfectly and 100 percent legal. This has nothing to do with morals, its the fact of the game. If you ever sat at a real poker tbale you would know this. I very rarely sit at the same table as someone i know and if i do we never speak of cards at all ever. I play too many tables to even try and keep up with such a thing anyways and i would imagine it would beharder to just play your own game.

Back to ongame. I know many people who are having the same problems with this site. My problem is not isolaed. A few people i know are owed over 100k yet the site hasnt provided them with any information. The site hasnt yet to cave in because they havent cameout with their story. Ongame is not reliable and from what it looks to me they are just hoping this bill makes it hard for americans to play so that they never have to pay out these plkayers who are owed adn just pay out the lesser ones. Think about it what lawyer would take ona case to go after an online site when the governmetn just made it illegal to get your money? Noone and the site knows this...........

[lozen]

One thing no one gives credit too is that Pokerroom is here responding to the complaints. Also if you havea Problem with Hollywood Julie is quick to solve your problem. The big problem with Ongame looks to be Pokes Poker and Futurebet. They are not paying out in a timely fashion. I would like to see them, post as to waht they are doing to improve their services. If nothing This will be there downfall.

[lozen]

Two more e-mails today and finally paid not worth the extra rake

[I Gotta Push]

Irish, you used multiple accounts there and shared accounts with people and probably colluded. I had multiple regulars comment to me to keep an eye on you. Most people on PR assumed you were scandalous and I will maintain that assumption. I'm glad they took your money, you don't deserve it. You're a punk

[irishcurve08]

good one....actually i got every dime because they realized i did nothing wrong. I also only had one account and never once colluded.....and whats stakes do u play the 50 cent game? How can one collude heads up which is where 95percent of my games were.